2.2 sec in total
348 ms
1.1 sec
699 ms
Visit hedmanmethod.com now to see the best up-to-date Hedman Method content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hedmanmethod.com
Miami's #1 microblading specialist. Book your appointment today and find out why the Hedman method is rated so highly!
Visit hedmanmethod.comWe analyzed Hedmanmethod.com page load time and found that the first response time was 348 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
hedmanmethod.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value600 ms
50/100
30%
Value0.131
81/100
15%
Value16.3 s
5/100
10%
348 ms
197 ms
37 ms
67 ms
94 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Hedmanmethod.com, 12% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to W.chatlio.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (350 ms) belongs to the original domain Hedmanmethod.com.
Page size can be reduced by 261.3 kB (10%)
2.7 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Hedmanmethod.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 146.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 146.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hedman Method images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 32.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hedmanmethod.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.2 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (77%)
57
13
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hedman Method. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hedmanmethod.com
348 ms
hedmanmethod.com
197 ms
main.min.css
37 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
67 ms
frontend.min.css
94 ms
swiper.min.css
100 ms
e-swiper.min.css
101 ms
post-334.css
102 ms
frontend.min.css
165 ms
all.min.css
137 ms
v4-shims.min.css
124 ms
global.css
130 ms
animations.min.css
134 ms
post-424.css
135 ms
post-354.css
154 ms
post-349.css
161 ms
style.css
182 ms
css
44 ms
fontawesome.min.css
181 ms
regular.min.css
187 ms
solid.min.css
188 ms
brands.min.css
192 ms
v4-shims.min.js
198 ms
platform.js
39 ms
widget-image.min.css
214 ms
widget-social-icons.min.css
220 ms
apple-webkit.min.css
220 ms
widget-heading.min.css
220 ms
widget-divider.min.css
222 ms
widget-text-editor.min.css
224 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
225 ms
widget-spacer.min.css
228 ms
post-1422.css
228 ms
frontend.min.js
283 ms
jquery.min.js
290 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
284 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
283 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
284 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
284 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
311 ms
hooks.min.js
278 ms
platform.js
34 ms
i18n.min.js
247 ms
frontend.min.js
227 ms
core.min.js
222 ms
frontend.min.js
227 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
230 ms
w.chatlio-widget.js
88 ms
Logo.png
160 ms
bokeh-background-1.jpg
196 ms
blonde-woman-1024x968.png
350 ms
brows-large-6-1024x614.jpg
195 ms
Office-1.2-Cropped-1-1024x576-1.jpg
177 ms
Microblading-3-Retouched-Small-1024x684.jpg
195 ms
new-image-33.jpg
224 ms
Working-Client-9.jpg
267 ms
circle.svg
214 ms
Office-1-Cropped-1-1024x576-1.jpg
220 ms
review-images-1024x583.jpg
222 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
37 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
57 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
81 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff
97 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff
98 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
98 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
98 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff
97 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff
99 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
205 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
178 ms
BernhardFashionBT-Regular.ttf
187 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
220 ms
w.chatlio-widget.js
28 ms
hedmanmethod.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
hedmanmethod.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
hedmanmethod.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hedmanmethod.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hedmanmethod.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hedmanmethod.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hedman Method. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: