Tools & Wizards About Us
heightcomparison.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

heightcomparison.com

Height Comparison - Comparing Heights Visually With Chart

Page Load Speed

996 ms in total

First Response

31 ms

Resources Loaded

703 ms

Page Rendered

262 ms

heightcomparison.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Height Comparison content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about heightcomparison.com

HeightComparison is the most accurate tool on the internet to compare height between people, or objects.

Visit heightcomparison.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Heightcomparison.com page load time and found that the first response time was 31 ms and then it took 965 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

heightcomparison.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value12,240 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.207

60/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value46.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

heightcomparison.com

31 ms

www.heightcomparison.com

160 ms

gtm.js

63 ms

logo.c7f2436.svg

36 ms

twitter.b25f6ca.svg

161 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Heightcomparison.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (316 ms) belongs to the original domain Heightcomparison.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 77.3 kB (18%)

Content Size

434.9 kB

After Optimization

357.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Heightcomparison.com main page is 434.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 340.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 76.6 kB

  • Original 94.1 kB
  • After minification 92.6 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 652 B

  • Original 340.8 kB
  • After minification 340.8 kB
  • After compression 340.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (64%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Height Comparison. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

heightcomparison.com

heightcomparison.com

31 ms

www.heightcomparison.com

www.heightcomparison.com

160 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

63 ms

logo.c7f2436.svg

logo.c7f2436.svg

36 ms

twitter.b25f6ca.svg

twitter.b25f6ca.svg

161 ms

facebook.e68a2f7.svg

facebook.e68a2f7.svg

87 ms

state.js

state.js

69 ms

df9aabc.js

df9aabc.js

69 ms

48eb77e.js

48eb77e.js

172 ms

bff772e.js

bff772e.js

78 ms

664f540.js

664f540.js

179 ms

b917cb1.js

b917cb1.js

181 ms

17a1dea.js

17a1dea.js

143 ms

2b9c8fb.js

2b9c8fb.js

185 ms

5a4a6b1.js

5a4a6b1.js

186 ms

0aab14e.js

0aab14e.js

192 ms

twitter.3409eeb.svg

twitter.3409eeb.svg

179 ms

Poppins-Regular.35d26b7.ttf

Poppins-Regular.35d26b7.ttf

254 ms

Poppins-Medium.673ed42.ttf

Poppins-Medium.673ed42.ttf

267 ms

Poppins-Light.7641a0f.ttf

Poppins-Light.7641a0f.ttf

316 ms

Poppins-SemiBold.ac8d04b.ttf

Poppins-SemiBold.ac8d04b.ttf

229 ms

Poppins-Bold.cdb29a5.ttf

Poppins-Bold.cdb29a5.ttf

280 ms

js

js

94 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

31 ms

hotjar-2942601.js

hotjar-2942601.js

166 ms

collect

collect

43 ms

Inter-Regular.e89cb19.ttf

Inter-Regular.e89cb19.ttf

157 ms

Inter-Medium.6dcbc9b.ttf

Inter-Medium.6dcbc9b.ttf

190 ms

Inter-Light.eec8664.ttf

Inter-Light.eec8664.ttf

228 ms

Inter-SemiBold.4d56bb2.ttf

Inter-SemiBold.4d56bb2.ttf

253 ms

Inter-Bold.88fa7ae.ttf

Inter-Bold.88fa7ae.ttf

295 ms

Inter-Black.143c284.ttf

Inter-Black.143c284.ttf

267 ms

collect

collect

30 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

36 ms

modules.a4fd7e5489291affcf56.js

modules.a4fd7e5489291affcf56.js

23 ms

Accessibility Review

heightcomparison.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

heightcomparison.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

heightcomparison.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Heightcomparison.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Heightcomparison.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

heightcomparison.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Height Comparison. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: