Tools & Wizards About Us
heightcomparisons.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

heightcomparisons.com

Height Comparison - Comparing People's Heights Visually With Chart

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

238 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

heightcomparisons.com screenshot

About Website

Visit heightcomparisons.com now to see the best up-to-date Height Comparison S content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about heightcomparisons.com

Height Comparison is the perfect tool for comparing the heights of two different people.

Visit heightcomparisons.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Heightcomparisons.com page load time and found that the first response time was 238 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

heightcomparisons.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,350 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.235

53/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.heightcomparisons.com

238 ms

style.css

28 ms

jquery.min.js

107 ms

js

184 ms

adsbygoogle.js

183 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Heightcomparisons.com, 16% (10 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 14% (9 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (971 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 53.4 kB (3%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Heightcomparisons.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 42.7 kB

  • Original 54.7 kB
  • After minification 54.7 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Height Comparison S images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 33.2 kB
  • After minification 33.2 kB
  • After compression 24.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.1 kB
  • After minification 2.1 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Heightcomparisons.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (64%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Height Comparison S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.heightcomparisons.com

www.heightcomparisons.com

238 ms

style.css

style.css

28 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

107 ms

js

js

184 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

183 ms

DMCABadgeHelper.min.js

DMCABadgeHelper.min.js

86 ms

sizes.js

sizes.js

86 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

92 ms

jquery.cookie.min.js

jquery.cookie.min.js

177 ms

manoutline.jpg

manoutline.jpg

213 ms

heightcomparisons.png

heightcomparisons.png

235 ms

dmca_protected_sml_120m.png

dmca_protected_sml_120m.png

177 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

141 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

82 ms

cookie.js

cookie.js

46 ms

integrator.js

integrator.js

51 ms

ads

ads

172 ms

ads

ads

774 ms

integrator.js

integrator.js

47 ms

ads

ads

490 ms

ads

ads

455 ms

ads

ads

399 ms

ads

ads

496 ms

ads

ads

971 ms

5554021194275029364_3046946394313574132.jpeg

5554021194275029364_3046946394313574132.jpeg

138 ms

load_preloaded_resource.js

load_preloaded_resource.js

143 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

120 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

131 ms

qs_click_protection.js

qs_click_protection.js

131 ms

rx_lidar.js

rx_lidar.js

183 ms

fac60d4cdc0b8be56d9f8d6f9ac54a3d.js

fac60d4cdc0b8be56d9f8d6f9ac54a3d.js

562 ms

icon.png

icon.png

43 ms

9863225251771622048

9863225251771622048

729 ms

5bbe539ad7c95ad1b7dc2874c2ab6f46.js

5bbe539ad7c95ad1b7dc2874c2ab6f46.js

494 ms

2c31c29323708f8c18cb525f4f35abd1.js

2c31c29323708f8c18cb525f4f35abd1.js

672 ms

57d1ab5f26c7e10f1646c6ff79d34874.js

57d1ab5f26c7e10f1646c6ff79d34874.js

716 ms

cookie_push_onload.html

cookie_push_onload.html

425 ms

css

css

524 ms

dpixel

dpixel

507 ms

trk

trk

504 ms

googleredir

googleredir

276 ms

dpixel

dpixel

591 ms

trk

trk

507 ms

activeview

activeview

289 ms

s

s

169 ms

css

css

134 ms

pixel

pixel

167 ms

pixel

pixel

165 ms

pixel

pixel

153 ms

pixel

pixel

145 ms

activeview

activeview

86 ms

ea8FacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVDv79pA.ttf

ea8FacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVDv79pA.ttf

94 ms

ea8IacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVBg3etBD7SQ.ttf

ea8IacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVBg3etBD7SQ.ttf

122 ms

sodar

sodar

88 ms

activeview

activeview

63 ms

ZEudAwKmaTNpvGbgtwbUkI0ybKz2KwCtXmqAoF5myvk.js

ZEudAwKmaTNpvGbgtwbUkI0ybKz2KwCtXmqAoF5myvk.js

52 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf

53 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf

58 ms

pixel

pixel

32 ms

pixel

pixel

32 ms

pixel

pixel

45 ms

pixel

pixel

29 ms

pixel

pixel

44 ms

Accessibility Review

heightcomparisons.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

heightcomparisons.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

heightcomparisons.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Heightcomparisons.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Heightcomparisons.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

heightcomparisons.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Height Comparison S. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: