890 ms in total
98 ms
721 ms
71 ms
Click here to check amazing Hendall content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hendall.com
Serving civilian agencies to supporting the defense communities that protect our Nation, Hendall delivers solutions that improve the quality of life.
Visit hendall.comWe analyzed Hendall.com page load time and found that the first response time was 98 ms and then it took 792 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
hendall.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value10.5 s
0/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value580 ms
51/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.2 s
32/100
10%
98 ms
276 ms
42 ms
53 ms
116 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Hendall.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (276 ms) belongs to the original domain Hendall.com.
Page size can be reduced by 48.3 kB (4%)
1.3 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Hendall.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 916.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hendall images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 94 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hendall.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (71%)
35
10
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hendall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hendall.com
98 ms
hendall.com
276 ms
style.min.css
42 ms
rs6.css
53 ms
style.css
116 ms
js_composer.min.css
70 ms
shortcodes.css
102 ms
responsive.css
100 ms
Defaults.css
117 ms
jquery.min.js
114 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
116 ms
rbtools.min.js
116 ms
rs6.min.js
117 ms
iyq7jyr.css
112 ms
js
202 ms
css
106 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
116 ms
waypoints.min.js
117 ms
waypoints-sticky.min.js
125 ms
prettyPhoto.js
115 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
115 ms
functions.js
201 ms
flexslider.min.js
117 ms
smoothscroll.js
117 ms
comment-reply.min.js
125 ms
wp-embed.min.js
126 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
128 ms
style.css
33 ms
p.css
24 ms
logo-compliant.png
56 ms
logo-compliant-retina.png
50 ms
homepage-image-dots.jpg
46 ms
TALENT.jpg
48 ms
CAPABILITIES-2.jpg
47 ms
PERFORMANCE.jpg
50 ms
RESULTS-3.jpg
50 ms
CLIENTS.jpg
50 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
49 ms
d
35 ms
d
40 ms
d
39 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
55 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
56 ms
hendall.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hendall.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
hendall.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hendall.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hendall.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hendall.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hendall. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: