Tools & Wizards About Us
heresanidea.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 99

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

heresanidea.net

Page Load Speed

397 ms in total

First Response

41 ms

Resources Loaded

356 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

heresanidea.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Heresanidea content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about heresanidea.net

Forsale Lander

Visit heresanidea.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Heresanidea.net page load time and found that the first response time was 41 ms and then it took 356 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

heresanidea.net performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

48/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,620 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

heresanidea.net

41 ms

heresanidea.net

153 ms

uxcore2.min.css

31 ms

noheader.min.css

42 ms

bff84d4aa62dc034.css

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Heresanidea.net, 58% (15 requests) were made to Afternic.com and 27% (7 requests) were made to Img6.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (153 ms) relates to the external source Afternic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 74.5 kB (49%)

Content Size

152.6 kB

After Optimization

78.1 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Heresanidea.net main page is 152.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 101.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 61.8 kB

  • Original 101.9 kB
  • After minification 101.8 kB
  • After compression 40.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.8 kB or 61% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 13.4 kB
  • After minification 12.8 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 37.3 kB
  • After minification 37.1 kB
  • After compression 33.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Heresanidea.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (92%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Heresanidea. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

heresanidea.net

heresanidea.net

41 ms

heresanidea.net

heresanidea.net

153 ms

uxcore2.min.css

uxcore2.min.css

31 ms

noheader.min.css

noheader.min.css

42 ms

bff84d4aa62dc034.css

bff84d4aa62dc034.css

24 ms

cf230d06d2a86184.css

cf230d06d2a86184.css

39 ms

bfe2d755e7d21e76.css

bfe2d755e7d21e76.css

40 ms

polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js

polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js

37 ms

webpack-abd428484949c941.js

webpack-abd428484949c941.js

50 ms

main-999f8182f179b553.js

main-999f8182f179b553.js

89 ms

framework-f7ba292b22b03fed.js

framework-f7ba292b22b03fed.js

49 ms

_app-6a51282f8efae752.js

_app-6a51282f8efae752.js

95 ms

978-52af53123a2cdee7.js

978-52af53123a2cdee7.js

53 ms

932-5f8574b507db60dc.js

932-5f8574b507db60dc.js

94 ms

%5Bdomain%5D-2fb839cf79e515a4.js

%5Bdomain%5D-2fb839cf79e515a4.js

84 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

87 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

93 ms

_middlewareManifest.js

_middlewareManifest.js

85 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

52 ms

uxcore2.min.js

uxcore2.min.js

49 ms

vendor~uxcore2.min.js

vendor~uxcore2.min.js

48 ms

heartbeat.js

heartbeat.js

45 ms

noheader.min.js

noheader.min.js

46 ms

MCB7T-RXHNH-PGQRJ-J6HWP-UGRWC

MCB7T-RXHNH-PGQRJ-J6HWP-UGRWC

71 ms

aksb.min.js

aksb.min.js

67 ms

utag.js

utag.js

96 ms

Accessibility Review

heresanidea.net accessibility score

99

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

heresanidea.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

heresanidea.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Heresanidea.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Heresanidea.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

heresanidea.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Heresanidea. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: