7.7 sec in total
517 ms
5.4 sec
1.8 sec
Click here to check amazing Heritage Tuckpointing content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about heritagetuckpointing.net
Professional Tuckpointing and Restoration services throughout Perth
Visit heritagetuckpointing.netWe analyzed Heritagetuckpointing.net page load time and found that the first response time was 517 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
heritagetuckpointing.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.29
41/100
15%
Value4.6 s
81/100
10%
517 ms
1118 ms
16 ms
433 ms
651 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Heritagetuckpointing.net, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Heritagetuckpointing.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (6%)
20.3 MB
19.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Heritagetuckpointing.net main page is 20.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 20.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.9 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 928.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Heritage Tuckpointing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 171.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 171.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 64.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Heritagetuckpointing.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 64.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (26%)
46
34
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Heritage Tuckpointing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
heritagetuckpointing.net
517 ms
heritagetuckpointing.net
1118 ms
css
16 ms
style.css
433 ms
skeleton.css
651 ms
flexslider.css
657 ms
prettyPhoto.css
875 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
1092 ms
modernizr.js
876 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
445 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
656 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
878 ms
jquery.validate.js
938 ms
jquery.form.js
874 ms
twitter.js
937 ms
custom.js
937 ms
logo.png
439 ms
tel-icon.png
221 ms
banner-image.jpg
661 ms
banner-image-2.jpg
656 ms
banner-image-3.jpg
874 ms
icon-bg-1.png
437 ms
6.jpg
1745 ms
gallery-hover-sprite.png
656 ms
4.jpg
874 ms
6.jpg
875 ms
8.jpg
1092 ms
10.jpg
878 ms
12.jpg
1750 ms
14.jpg
1093 ms
16.jpg
1094 ms
18.jpg
1098 ms
20.jpg
1529 ms
22.jpg
1321 ms
24.jpg
1322 ms
3.jpg
1977 ms
9.jpg
2420 ms
10.jpg
2855 ms
8.jpg
2837 ms
5.jpg
2403 ms
2.jpg
2201 ms
8.jpg
2420 ms
8.jpg
2646 ms
pattern-1.png
2622 ms
testimonial-icon.jpg
2638 ms
footer-bg.jpg
2638 ms
footer-logo.png
2840 ms
1 ms
slider-pager.png
2799 ms
heritagetuckpointing.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
heritagetuckpointing.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
heritagetuckpointing.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Heritagetuckpointing.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Heritagetuckpointing.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
heritagetuckpointing.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Heritage Tuckpointing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: