22.4 sec in total
4.5 sec
17.7 sec
204 ms
Visit hescale.com now to see the best up-to-date Hescale content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hescale.com
Visit hescale.comWe analyzed Hescale.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.5 sec and then it took 17.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
hescale.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value1,070 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.221
56/100
15%
Value8.9 s
34/100
10%
4458 ms
2101 ms
2164 ms
966 ms
3530 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Hescale.com, 11% (7 requests) were made to Fontstatic.useso.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.useso.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.8 sec) relates to the external source Fontstatic.useso.com.
Page size can be reduced by 379.0 kB (72%)
527.4 kB
148.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Hescale.com main page is 527.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 384.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hescale needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.2 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 268.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 268.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hescale.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 83.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (75%)
56
14
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hescale. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hescale.com
4458 ms
language-selector.css
2101 ms
style.css
2164 ms
style-mobile.css
966 ms
css
3530 ms
css
2579 ms
organic-shortcodes.css
1445 ms
font-awesome.css
1681 ms
html5shiv.js
1205 ms
jquery.js
3414 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1207 ms
hoverIntent.js
1447 ms
superfish.js
1448 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
1686 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
2886 ms
jquery.modal.min.js
1689 ms
masonry.min.js
2169 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
1454 ms
jquery.custom.js
1457 ms
navigation.js
1695 ms
core.min.js
1698 ms
widget.min.js
1690 ms
accordion.min.js
1699 ms
mouse.min.js
1703 ms
resizable.min.js
2171 ms
draggable.min.js
2180 ms
button.min.js
1943 ms
position.min.js
2171 ms
dialog.min.js
2424 ms
jquery.shortcodes.js
2412 ms
tabs.min.js
2651 ms
tabs.js
2413 ms
sitepress.js
736 ms
weblogo.png
969 ms
axle_scale.jpg
5992 ms
en.png
252 ms
banner2.jpg
2168 ms
banner1.jpg
1928 ms
Accessary.jpg
1958 ms
thumb1.jpg
732 ms
thumb2.jpg
494 ms
thumb3.jpg
1214 ms
footlogo.png
972 ms
LOGO.gif
723 ms
fr.png
258 ms
es.png
258 ms
zh-hant.png
482 ms
RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
4111 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6ngV_pQ1T3xN3K1c3sB361us.ttf
3678 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nn06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf
7785 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nvzeo8SCrGyBsNQUDsw2Qr8.ttf
7421 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
4138 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
4341 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
5428 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1187 ms
z_stat.php
2258 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
3359 ms
stat.htm
157 ms
core.php
1492 ms
9.gif
1728 ms
pic.gif
1183 ms
analytics.js
24 ms
collect
13 ms
app.gif
4705 ms
prev_btn.png
244 ms
next_btn.png
243 ms
hescale.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hescale.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
hescale.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hescale.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hescale.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hescale.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hescale. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: