2.4 sec in total
247 ms
1.6 sec
504 ms
Click here to check amazing Hideme content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hideme.name
Protect your devices and gain access to websites. Round-the-clock customer support. VPN for Windows, Android, macOS, iOS, and routers. Free trial period.
Visit hideme.nameWe analyzed Hideme.name page load time and found that the first response time was 247 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
hideme.name performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value4.9 s
28/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value2,630 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
247 ms
28 ms
169 ms
26 ms
35 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Hideme.name, 88% (63 requests) were made to Hide.mn and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (558 ms) relates to the external source Partner.hidemy.name.
Page size can be reduced by 88.1 kB (8%)
1.1 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Hideme.name main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 902.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hideme images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hideme.name has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (45%)
65
36
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hideme. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
hideme.name
247 ms
hidemyna.me
28 ms
169 ms
slick.css
26 ms
main.css
35 ms
faq.css
33 ms
jquery-3.5.1.min.js
51 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
51 ms
email-decode.min.js
47 ms
EBSrukxUuA
300 ms
slick.min.js
47 ms
main.js
103 ms
form_settings_by_code.js
104 ms
trackjs.js
120 ms
gtm.js
254 ms
logo_nodot.png
29 ms
thread_cat_bg_v4-1x.png
173 ms
bg_waves.png
29 ms
hiding_cat.png
28 ms
fishing_cat.png
40 ms
playing_cat.png
173 ms
released_cat.png
175 ms
main_page_round_1_v2.png
174 ms
main_page_round_2_v2.png
176 ms
main_page_round_3_v2.png
206 ms
eng_1.png
173 ms
eng_2.png
206 ms
eng_3.png
205 ms
sprite.png
205 ms
2.png
205 ms
3.png
204 ms
4.png
209 ms
eng_1.png
208 ms
eng_2.png
207 ms
eng_3.png
210 ms
en_1.png
211 ms
en_2.png
209 ms
en_3.png
218 ms
eng_1.png
218 ms
eng_2.png
220 ms
eng_3.png
221 ms
hook_v5.png
219 ms
hook-part_v5.png
220 ms
payment-methods_btc.png
221 ms
appstore_logo.png
242 ms
en-ios.png
246 ms
mastercard_visa_logo.png
242 ms
plane.png
247 ms
Wi-Fi.png
240 ms
ad.png
234 ms
cinema.png
236 ms
language.png
221 ms
sport.png
225 ms
track.php
558 ms
anonimus.png
214 ms
shield.png
131 ms
unlock.png
81 ms
rub.png
81 ms
gb.png
82 ms
ru.png
81 ms
es.png
84 ms
PT-Emil-400.woff
75 ms
PT-Emil-200.woff
60 ms
PT-Emil-0.woff
66 ms
PT-Emil-800.woff
65 ms
ua.png
84 ms
de.png
83 ms
cn.png
84 ms
tr.png
82 ms
sa.png
80 ms
to-top-arr.svg
82 ms
EBSrukxUuA
27 ms
hideme.name accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
hideme.name best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
hideme.name SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hideme.name can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hideme.name main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hideme.name
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hideme. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: