Tools & Wizards About Us
highefficiency.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

highefficiency.net

HiEFiCiENCi – Cyber Technology Solutions | Security Testing

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

393 ms

Resources Loaded

5.2 sec

Page Rendered

533 ms

highefficiency.net screenshot

About Website

Visit highefficiency.net now to see the best up-to-date Highef Fi CiEN Cy content for Oman and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about highefficiency.net

Visit highefficiency.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Highefficiency.net page load time and found that the first response time was 393 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

highefficiency.net performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

52/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,320 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.1 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

highefficiency.net

393 ms

frontend.min.css

1140 ms

astra-local-fonts.css

297 ms

sidebar-app.css

253 ms

css2

82 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Highefficiency.net, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Highefficiency.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 193.4 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Highefficiency.net main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 857.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 155.8 kB

  • Original 187.8 kB
  • After minification 184.0 kB
  • After compression 32.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 155.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 36.5 kB

  • Original 336.2 kB
  • After minification 299.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Highef Fi CiEN Cy needs image optimization as it can save up to 36.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 695 B

  • Original 857.8 kB
  • After minification 857.8 kB
  • After compression 857.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 355 B

  • Original 68.5 kB
  • After minification 68.5 kB
  • After compression 68.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Highefficiency.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (79%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Highef Fi CiEN Cy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 52 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

highefficiency.net

highefficiency.net

393 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

1140 ms

astra-local-fonts.css

astra-local-fonts.css

297 ms

sidebar-app.css

sidebar-app.css

253 ms

css2

css2

82 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

338 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

329 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

327 ms

post-207.css

post-207.css

1410 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

582 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

623 ms

post-205.css

post-205.css

620 ms

css

css

68 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

644 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

883 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

890 ms

js

js

99 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

149 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

622 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

895 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

928 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

1196 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1218 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

911 ms

main.js

main.js

924 ms

react.min.js

react.min.js

1205 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

1273 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1564 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1565 ms

url.min.js

url.min.js

1564 ms

api-fetch.min.js

api-fetch.min.js

1567 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

1565 ms

deprecated.min.js

deprecated.min.js

1717 ms

dom.min.js

dom.min.js

1853 ms

escape-html.min.js

escape-html.min.js

1758 ms

element.min.js

element.min.js

1778 ms

is-shallow-equal.min.js

is-shallow-equal.min.js

1925 ms

keycodes.min.js

keycodes.min.js

1850 ms

priority-queue.min.js

priority-queue.min.js

1963 ms

compose.min.js

compose.min.js

1777 ms

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

89 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

1847 ms

date.min.js

date.min.js

1885 ms

html-entities.min.js

html-entities.min.js

1803 ms

primitives.min.js

primitives.min.js

2046 ms

private-apis.min.js

private-apis.min.js

1800 ms

redux-routine.min.js

redux-routine.min.js

1829 ms

data.min.js

data.min.js

1668 ms

rich-text.min.js

rich-text.min.js

1471 ms

warning.min.js

warning.min.js

1519 ms

components.min.js

components.min.js

1808 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

1812 ms

sidebar-app.js

sidebar-app.js

1276 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1549 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1516 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1652 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1848 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1804 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1679 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1501 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

2548 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1615 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

1691 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

243 ms

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

155 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1428 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

1476 ms

bg-001-free-img.png

bg-001-free-img.png

1552 ms

bg-0002-free-img.jpg

bg-0002-free-img.jpg

3202 ms

bg-05-free-img.png

bg-05-free-img.png

1726 ms

tech-shield-security-logo-design-template-.png

tech-shield-security-logo-design-template-.png

1601 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

47 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

56 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

71 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

86 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

88 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

88 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1745 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1681 ms

astra.woff

astra.woff

1831 ms

tech-shield-security-logo-design-template-1.png

tech-shield-security-logo-design-template-1.png

1761 ms

tech-shield-security-logo-design-template-2.png

tech-shield-security-logo-design-template-2.png

1912 ms

bg-003-free-img.png

bg-003-free-img.png

1854 ms

ads

ads

176 ms

ca-pub-4494190105104085

ca-pub-4494190105104085

63 ms

Logo@2x-270x51.png

Logo@2x-270x51.png

262 ms

signature-01-free-img.png

signature-01-free-img.png

276 ms

Nasmo-Logo.png

Nasmo-Logo.png

299 ms

atheerIT_logo-1.png

atheerIT_logo-1.png

272 ms

ompcxlogo.png

ompcxlogo.png

349 ms

1000x1000w2-300x300.png

1000x1000w2-300x300.png

593 ms

Accessibility Review

highefficiency.net accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

highefficiency.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

highefficiency.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Highefficiency.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Highefficiency.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

highefficiency.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Highef Fi CiEN Cy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: