2.5 sec in total
55 ms
1.7 sec
763 ms
Click here to check amazing Hightestscores content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hightestscores.com
BJU Press is your source for Christian educational materials, services, and online resources
Visit hightestscores.comWe analyzed Hightestscores.com page load time and found that the first response time was 55 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
hightestscores.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value18.3 s
0/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value1,450 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value21.1 s
1/100
10%
55 ms
283 ms
49 ms
61 ms
113 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Hightestscores.com, 83% (66 requests) were made to Us.static.dynamics365commerce.ms and 5% (4 requests) were made to Images-us-prod.cms.commerce.dynamics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (958 ms) relates to the external source Us.static.dynamics365commerce.ms.
Page size can be reduced by 536.7 kB (20%)
2.7 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Hightestscores.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 310.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 310.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 93.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hightestscores images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 132.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 132.1 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (85%)
68
10
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hightestscores. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 59 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
hightestscores.com
55 ms
www.bjupress.com
283 ms
OtAutoBlock.js
49 ms
otSDKStub.js
61 ms
christian-school.632af672fd67d1172dc531855a50e79a.min.css
113 ms
LogRocket.min.js
66 ms
react.production.min.js
257 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
343 ms
163.078dab8dfcc08f9aa6d6.chunk.js
372 ms
b4ca73b28362008e81eb.bundle.js
372 ms
978cb8325a0863a9375a.bundle.js
393 ms
cc853dafb65dfbbf1d4d.bundle.js
376 ms
5afc980491e85018ed23.bundle.js
371 ms
0f53446a37f31f2429b6.bundle.js
473 ms
74eb7b621dc90ce0f4ee.bundle.js
377 ms
e24e593f4cb0a33313d7.bundle.js
375 ms
bcbe4642b4944d44a0b2.bundle.js
402 ms
cfbe1efbf32b153c64bc.bundle.js
406 ms
ab4c2be1ca48466060e2.bundle.js
388 ms
a62e7e7421c62089975a.bundle.js
746 ms
55f7e4a3e2c972b807f8.bundle.js
401 ms
473701e14dbd85dbfb4d.bundle.js
432 ms
e16dff5588a54423ce51.bundle.js
410 ms
43593285b7ca9338ac97.bundle.js
440 ms
3c3d12b89902809393bf.bundle.js
420 ms
67e2482145bdce3b3247.bundle.js
443 ms
be19691632b299f55886.bundle.js
441 ms
7614b5dca486510e2908.bundle.js
458 ms
c36f430146c3320fe339.bundle.js
450 ms
b1067e4a55c37fdb6c5b.bundle.js
450 ms
6236da0367b16ebd5431.bundle.js
458 ms
0086ddfb8ee98f7400cc.bundle.js
461 ms
5cac12d7178353f1075e.bundle.js
466 ms
4e23ad406e60cb656928.bundle.js
466 ms
0866836d72844c91daca.bundle.js
472 ms
2334a594d1969f39dd9b.bundle.js
474 ms
20a8759df1d0190d38cf.bundle.js
477 ms
256f2743234f868c0ff1.bundle.js
482 ms
8c5ca4aee74a6c7e5485.bundle.js
481 ms
aa9c3c0c9c30540a5b53.bundle.js
566 ms
e55d0ecbc8f809b3164c.bundle.js
485 ms
84cf49c0-72a0-4bd7-b0a8-8c7cc7dbb4fc.json
27 ms
MA26cC
216 ms
MA2bmm
267 ms
MA28Lw
209 ms
MA28KF
188 ms
MA28LO
189 ms
MA28K8
273 ms
MA2bmp
344 ms
MA26ap
352 ms
957ad9a902d80c7a51ef.bundle.js
302 ms
efee2bbea16351cb14f8.bundle.js
238 ms
f16e4c29500dc934ac5f.bundle.js
958 ms
6150d73c0979fcd939f9.bundle.js
136 ms
3cf09db52abca8a725b4.bundle.js
147 ms
1096acfbbb4b7284948b.bundle.js
155 ms
8671deb626d3c8a70a00.bundle.js
232 ms
c57ffe791c8f6668d2c0.bundle.js
192 ms
872c9fd983bc3b76043a.bundle.js
202 ms
964964781befd63986bc.bundle.js
190 ms
1647b7cec153838c765e.bundle.js
193 ms
151b0ba20514815648b3.bundle.js
191 ms
9d137484261805c9b97b.bundle.js
196 ms
7ed2c4b85756b98324ab.bundle.js
194 ms
e1f2b35e0a4370d62a79.bundle.js
200 ms
958fb180d76b3c3362ef.bundle.js
196 ms
09f5f133fba0ce709e70.bundle.js
419 ms
a4f9340f9ef4370527c2.bundle.js
185 ms
e9a93ae0242245a9bd86.bundle.js
191 ms
970ed73679396ed10508.bundle.js
514 ms
Lato-Regular.ttf
206 ms
Lato-Semibold.ttf
266 ms
Lato-Bold.ttf
360 ms
Lato-Black.ttf
274 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
296 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
302 ms
Lato-Italic.ttf
323 ms
Lato-SemiboldItalic.ttf
384 ms
Lato-BoldItalic.ttf
328 ms
Lato-BlackItalic.ttf
365 ms
hightestscores.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
hightestscores.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
hightestscores.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hightestscores.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hightestscores.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hightestscores.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hightestscores. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: