2.7 sec in total
322 ms
2.3 sec
88 ms
Welcome to hildering.com homepage info - get ready to check Hildering best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about hildering.com
Specialised in tin can packaging, we have a complete and extensive range for the paint and chemical industry.
Visit hildering.comWe analyzed Hildering.com page load time and found that the first response time was 322 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
hildering.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value4.1 s
47/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value1,700 ms
11/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.6 s
14/100
10%
322 ms
548 ms
108 ms
313 ms
290 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Hildering.com, 15% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (548 ms) belongs to the original domain Hildering.com.
Page size can be reduced by 12.2 kB (5%)
235.3 kB
223.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Hildering.com main page is 235.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 163.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hildering.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (31%)
29
20
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hildering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
hildering.com
322 ms
548 ms
template.css
108 ms
jquery.min.js
313 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
290 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
291 ms
caption.js
293 ms
template.css
291 ms
js
75 ms
9UNozpcx7o0
151 ms
hildering_siteheader.jpg
119 ms
home_hildering.gif
119 ms
nl.gif
118 ms
en.gif
120 ms
de.gif
119 ms
fr.gif
119 ms
searchButton.gif
471 ms
icons.svg
469 ms
home_packaging.gif
470 ms
home_packaging04.jpg
471 ms
home_innovations.gif
471 ms
home_innovations02.jpg
471 ms
home_gopaint_logo.jpg
472 ms
home_gopaint07.jpg
472 ms
www-player.css
7 ms
www-embed-player.js
26 ms
base.js
51 ms
ad_status.js
158 ms
vD-PFjxSijoP4-I0oY5JcElr_81RPxK9SqvIhUi9qS8.js
117 ms
embed.js
46 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
41 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
42 ms
id
16 ms
hildering.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hildering.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
hildering.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hildering.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hildering.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hildering.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hildering. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: