Tools & Wizards About Us
hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk

Hingham History Centre - Hingham History Centre, Hingham, Norfolk, UK

Page Load Speed

9.1 sec in total

First Response

4.1 sec

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

134 ms

hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Hingham History Centre content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk

The aim of the Hingham History Centre website is to share the vast amount of information about the town that has been collected. More added each month.

Visit hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 4.1 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value960 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.156

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.3 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk

4052 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

253 ms

styles.css

175 ms

icomoon-the7-font.min.css

259 ms

front.min.css

176 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (78%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

588.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 61.4 kB

  • Original 76.9 kB
  • After minification 75.7 kB
  • After compression 15.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 190 B

  • Original 48.1 kB
  • After minification 47.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hingham History Centre images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 866.4 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 355.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 866.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 169.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (83%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hingham History Centre. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk

hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk

4052 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

253 ms

styles.css

styles.css

175 ms

icomoon-the7-font.min.css

icomoon-the7-font.min.css

259 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

176 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

603 ms

css

css

30 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

590 ms

custom-scrollbar.min.css

custom-scrollbar.min.css

233 ms

wpbakery.min.css

wpbakery.min.css

278 ms

post-type.min.css

post-type.min.css

400 ms

css-vars.css

css-vars.css

406 ms

custom.css

custom.css

613 ms

media.css

media.css

500 ms

mega-menu.css

mega-menu.css

488 ms

the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css

the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css

494 ms

post-type-dynamic.css

post-type-dynamic.css

600 ms

style.css

style.css

600 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

601 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

659 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

659 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

672 ms

above-the-fold.min.js

above-the-fold.min.js

673 ms

ultimate-params.min.js

ultimate-params.min.js

675 ms

custom.min.js

custom.min.js

697 ms

css

css

14 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

462 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

463 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

799 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

476 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

476 ms

index.js

index.js

494 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

552 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

555 ms

legacy.min.js

legacy.min.js

555 ms

jquery-mousewheel.min.js

jquery-mousewheel.min.js

556 ms

custom-scrollbar.min.js

custom-scrollbar.min.js

575 ms

post-type.min.js

post-type.min.js

641 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

642 ms

vc-waypoints.min.js

vc-waypoints.min.js

642 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

22 ms

Hingham-History-Centre-logo-header2.jpg

Hingham-History-Centre-logo-header2.jpg

233 ms

Hingham-History-Centre-logo-mobile19.jpg

Hingham-History-Centre-logo-mobile19.jpg

250 ms

the7-chevron-down.svg

the7-chevron-down.svg

331 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

318 ms

home-about-photoTEMP.jpg

home-about-photoTEMP.jpg

320 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

47 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

48 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

53 ms

collect

collect

35 ms

js

js

89 ms

Accessibility Review

hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hinghamhistorycentre.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hingham History Centre. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: