Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

history.im

my.ax: Spicy Dating For You | Find Love

Page Load Speed

901 ms in total

First Response

91 ms

Resources Loaded

485 ms

Page Rendered

325 ms

history.im screenshot

About Website

Welcome to history.im homepage info - get ready to check History best content right away, or after learning these important things about history.im

my.ax is your personal dating site with some spice. If you're single, come and meet, date, and find that one love.

Visit history.im

Key Findings

We analyzed History.im page load time and found that the first response time was 91 ms and then it took 810 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

history.im performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

75/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

history.im

91 ms

style_passport.css

16 ms

style_im.simkl.com.css

32 ms

jquery.min.js

51 ms

style_passport_loginAndReg.css

49 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original History.im, 3% (1 request) were made to Passport.simkl.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (92 ms) relates to the external source I.simkl.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 96.8 kB (26%)

Content Size

378.7 kB

After Optimization

281.9 kB

In fact, the total size of History.im main page is 378.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 260.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 14.2 kB
  • After minification 12.5 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 260.2 kB
  • After minification 258.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. History images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 22.4 kB

  • Original 32.1 kB
  • After minification 32.1 kB
  • After compression 9.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 22.4 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 61.9 kB

  • Original 72.3 kB
  • After minification 68.4 kB
  • After compression 10.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. History.im needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (53%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of History. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

history.im accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

history.im best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

history.im SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise History.im can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that History.im main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of History. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: