Tools & Wizards About Us
hockingdesign.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

hockingdesign.com

Hocking Design – Donna Hocking – Experienced Freelance Graphic Designer

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

326 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

447 ms

hockingdesign.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to hockingdesign.com homepage info - get ready to check Hocking Design best content right away, or after learning these important things about hockingdesign.com

Visit hockingdesign.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Hockingdesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 326 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hockingdesign.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.4 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hockingdesign.com

326 ms

style.min.css

92 ms

styles.css

179 ms

style.css

181 ms

style.css

181 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Hockingdesign.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Hockingdesign.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 95.8 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hockingdesign.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 60.5 kB

  • Original 74.5 kB
  • After minification 71.5 kB
  • After compression 14.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 15.2 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hocking Design images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 12.6 kB

  • Original 548.9 kB
  • After minification 548.6 kB
  • After compression 536.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 202.4 kB
  • After minification 201.8 kB
  • After compression 194.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hockingdesign.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 73 (87%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hocking Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 52 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

hockingdesign.com

hockingdesign.com

326 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

92 ms

styles.css

styles.css

179 ms

style.css

style.css

181 ms

style.css

style.css

181 ms

plugins.min.css

plugins.min.css

184 ms

modules.min.css

modules.min.css

196 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

188 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

265 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

270 ms

style.css

style.css

273 ms

simple-line-icons.css

simple-line-icons.css

277 ms

dripicons.css

dripicons.css

280 ms

style.css

style.css

284 ms

blog.min.css

blog.min.css

353 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

360 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

362 ms

modules-responsive.min.css

modules-responsive.min.css

367 ms

blog-responsive.min.css

blog-responsive.min.css

372 ms

style_dynamic_responsive.css

style_dynamic_responsive.css

375 ms

style_dynamic.css

style_dynamic.css

441 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

457 ms

css

css

17 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

452 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

512 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

554 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

553 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

607 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

607 ms

index.js

index.js

606 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

608 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

686 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

607 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

625 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

645 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

646 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

656 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

682 ms

Chart.min.js

Chart.min.js

619 ms

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

557 ms

TimelineLite.min.js

TimelineLite.min.js

560 ms

TweenLite.min.js

TweenLite.min.js

565 ms

absolute-counter.js

absolute-counter.js

567 ms

bootstrapCarousel.js

bootstrapCarousel.js

574 ms

counter.js

counter.js

586 ms

easypiechart.js

easypiechart.js

556 ms

fluidvids.min.js

fluidvids.min.js

556 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

663 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

573 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

569 ms

jquery.fullPage.min.js

jquery.fullPage.min.js

603 ms

jquery.hoverIntent.min.js

jquery.hoverIntent.min.js

555 ms

jquery.justifiedGallery.min.js

jquery.justifiedGallery.min.js

555 ms

jquery.mixitup.min.js

jquery.mixitup.min.js

607 ms

jquery.multiscroll.min.js

jquery.multiscroll.min.js

600 ms

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

604 ms

jquery.plugin.js

jquery.plugin.js

628 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

563 ms

jquery.stretch.js

jquery.stretch.js

577 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

521 ms

hocking-design-logo-pink-300x186.png

hocking-design-logo-pink-300x186.png

211 ms

jquery.waitforimages.js

jquery.waitforimages.js

482 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

510 ms

jquery.zzz.countdown.min.js

jquery.zzz.countdown.min.js

486 ms

modernizr.custom.85257.js

modernizr.custom.85257.js

488 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

551 ms

parallax.min.js

parallax.min.js

552 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

553 ms

font

font

96 ms

skrollr.min.js

skrollr.min.js

552 ms

font

font

177 ms

font

font

172 ms

font

font

190 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

537 ms

typed.js

typed.js

527 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

556 ms

smoothPageScroll.js

smoothPageScroll.js

533 ms

modules.min.js

modules.min.js

543 ms

blog.min.js

blog.min.js

543 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

552 ms

like.min.js

like.min.js

548 ms

Linearicons-Free.woff

Linearicons-Free.woff

601 ms

ElegantIcons.woff

ElegantIcons.woff

648 ms

hocking-design-logo-pink.png

hocking-design-logo-pink.png

583 ms

LondonVest-V3-600x600.jpg

LondonVest-V3-600x600.jpg

659 ms

DMHColourAnimation.gif

DMHColourAnimation.gif

553 ms

biotiful-cover-image-600x600.jpg

biotiful-cover-image-600x600.jpg

545 ms

cfwhite-logo.jpg

cfwhite-logo.jpg

847 ms

tbb-logo-design-600x600.png

tbb-logo-design-600x600.png

573 ms

zombie-ebook-design-ft-600x600.jpg

zombie-ebook-design-ft-600x600.jpg

610 ms

vibrant-vegan-packaging-design-ft-600x600.jpg

vibrant-vegan-packaging-design-ft-600x600.jpg

661 ms

accenture-presentation-design-ft3.gif

accenture-presentation-design-ft3.gif

1032 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

237 ms

Accessibility Review

hockingdesign.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

hockingdesign.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

hockingdesign.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hockingdesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hockingdesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hockingdesign.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hocking Design. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: