Tools & Wizards About Us
hollandshielding.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

hollandshielding.com

EMI/RFI gaskets & solutions | Holland Shielding Systems BV

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

352 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

hollandshielding.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Holland Shielding content for Belgium. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hollandshielding.com

EMI/RFI shielding product & solutions. ✅ Worldwide support for electronic ✅, medical ✅, space ✅ and defense ✅ industries.

Visit hollandshielding.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Hollandshielding.com page load time and found that the first response time was 352 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hollandshielding.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,390 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.259

48/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hollandshielding.com

352 ms

G0jYLWrWG2SQOUhwdbOOvP7AWJg.js

39 ms

googleFonts.css

71 ms

266 ms

style-dynamic.php

186 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Hollandshielding.com, 11% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (498 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 82.8 kB (50%)

Content Size

164.6 kB

After Optimization

81.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hollandshielding.com main page is 164.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 95.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 82.5 kB

  • Original 95.4 kB
  • After minification 78.0 kB
  • After compression 12.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.4 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1 B

  • Original 66.7 kB
  • After minification 66.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Holland Shielding images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 180 B

  • Original 1.8 kB
  • After minification 1.8 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 78 B

  • Original 690 B
  • After minification 690 B
  • After compression 612 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hollandshielding.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78 B or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (47%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Holland Shielding. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

hollandshielding.com

hollandshielding.com

352 ms

G0jYLWrWG2SQOUhwdbOOvP7AWJg.js

G0jYLWrWG2SQOUhwdbOOvP7AWJg.js

39 ms

googleFonts.css

googleFonts.css

71 ms

266 ms

style-dynamic.php

style-dynamic.php

186 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

26 ms

257 ms

api.js

api.js

102 ms

google-ads.js

google-ads.js

75 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

78 ms

fJoEmchM9AP7ix1wzO5jWSNAucQ.js

fJoEmchM9AP7ix1wzO5jWSNAucQ.js

45 ms

Happy-to-help.png

Happy-to-help.png

205 ms

1px.png

1px.png

49 ms

js

js

498 ms

general-products-background.jpg

general-products-background.jpg

263 ms

bg-text.png

bg-text.png

261 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

263 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

290 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

36 ms

Accessibility Review

hollandshielding.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

hollandshielding.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

hollandshielding.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hollandshielding.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hollandshielding.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hollandshielding.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Holland Shielding. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: