Tools & Wizards About Us
holytext.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

holytext.org

Holy Text Bible Prophecy, Alien deception, NWO, Conspiracy theory.

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

269 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

285 ms

holytext.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Holy Text content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about holytext.org

HolyText.org is a ministry during the end times, exposing the deceptions of the last days using the Holy Text given to us by Jesus Christ. Kjv only.

Visit holytext.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Holytext.org page load time and found that the first response time was 269 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

holytext.org performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.056

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.0 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

holytext.org

269 ms

style.min.css

52 ms

sow-image-default-8b5b6f678277.css

94 ms

dashicons.min.css

140 ms

css

37 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Holytext.org, 12% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (294 ms) belongs to the original domain Holytext.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 81.1 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

979.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Holytext.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 750.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 47.2 kB

  • Original 59.1 kB
  • After minification 53.2 kB
  • After compression 11.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 750.9 kB
  • After minification 750.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Holy Text images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 28.3 kB

  • Original 148.6 kB
  • After minification 148.6 kB
  • After compression 120.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 101.8 kB
  • After minification 101.8 kB
  • After compression 96.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Holytext.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (63%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Holy Text. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

holytext.org

holytext.org

269 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

52 ms

sow-image-default-8b5b6f678277.css

sow-image-default-8b5b6f678277.css

94 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

140 ms

css

css

37 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

141 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

96 ms

swipebox.css

swipebox.css

98 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

100 ms

denves-lite-own-carousel-template.css

denves-lite-own-carousel-template.css

146 ms

style.css

style.css

146 ms

denves-lite-woocommerce.css

denves-lite-woocommerce.css

149 ms

cyan.css

cyan.css

151 ms

addtoany.min.css

addtoany.min.css

186 ms

page.js

page.js

39 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

189 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

198 ms

addtoany.min.js

addtoany.min.js

216 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

216 ms

jquery.nicescroll.js

jquery.nicescroll.js

216 ms

jquery.swipebox.js

jquery.swipebox.js

231 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

237 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.js

jquery.touchSwipe.js

290 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

245 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

245 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

272 ms

denves-lite-template.js

denves-lite-template.js

293 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

294 ms

wp-slimstat.min.js

wp-slimstat.min.js

33 ms

1.js

1.js

33 ms

noweapon.jpg

noweapon.jpg

100 ms

qncehlcn.jpg

qncehlcn.jpg

171 ms

picturebible.jpg

picturebible.jpg

133 ms

FleshEatingGiantsofPeru.jpg

FleshEatingGiantsofPeru.jpg

223 ms

eyeoflucifer-min.jpg

eyeoflucifer-min.jpg

117 ms

whyishelleternaltorment-min.jpg

whyishelleternaltorment-min.jpg

180 ms

exposed-min.jpg

exposed-min.jpg

170 ms

sonsofgod-min.jpg

sonsofgod-min.jpg

252 ms

deadsnake.jpg

deadsnake.jpg

226 ms

lordshipsalvationheresy.jpg

lordshipsalvationheresy.jpg

264 ms

demons.jpg

demons.jpg

267 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmYWRm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmYWRm.ttf

18 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmYWRm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmYWRm.ttf

26 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWmYWRm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWmYWRm.ttf

58 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4OmYWRm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4OmYWRm.ttf

57 ms

client.json

client.json

166 ms

client.json

client.json

197 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

217 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

6 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDZbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDZbtY.ttf

18 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDZbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDZbtY.ttf

14 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfsunDZbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfsunDZbtY.ttf

18 ms

sm.25.html

sm.25.html

30 ms

eso.D0Uc7kY6.js

eso.D0Uc7kY6.js

36 ms

visit

visit

266 ms

205.svg

205.svg

151 ms

visit

visit

65 ms

Accessibility Review

holytext.org accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

holytext.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

holytext.org SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Holytext.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Holytext.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

holytext.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Holy Text. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: