Tools & Wizards About Us
homag.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

homag.com

HOMAG Holzbearbeitungsmaschinen, Software und Service

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

337 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

homag.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to homag.com homepage info - get ready to check HOMAG best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about homag.com

Maschinen und Service zur Holzbearbeitung vom führenden Hersteller HOMAG. Anlagen für holzbearbeitende Industrie & Handwerk!

Visit homag.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Homag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 337 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

homag.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.334

34/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

homag.com

337 ms

338 ms

merged-ffa3b2f3add7db3831b6f5746445593f-08f2e5edb5e515b7e6b4d87a03c39df0.css

121 ms

merged-217abaf0347f82dbe4021ca953ae6eb9-4d9dd8fcd70556519aa42f33b83b3feb.js

293 ms

Form.min-7c9890b86217493202251e81b961839d.js

294 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Homag.com, 7% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (812 ms) belongs to the original domain Homag.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 243.7 kB (19%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Homag.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 243.4 kB

  • Original 268.5 kB
  • After minification 146.1 kB
  • After compression 25.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 122.4 kB, which is 46% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 243.4 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 364 B

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 999.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. HOMAG images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of HOMAG. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

homag.com

homag.com

337 ms

338 ms

merged-ffa3b2f3add7db3831b6f5746445593f-08f2e5edb5e515b7e6b4d87a03c39df0.css

merged-ffa3b2f3add7db3831b6f5746445593f-08f2e5edb5e515b7e6b4d87a03c39df0.css

121 ms

merged-217abaf0347f82dbe4021ca953ae6eb9-4d9dd8fcd70556519aa42f33b83b3feb.js

merged-217abaf0347f82dbe4021ca953ae6eb9-4d9dd8fcd70556519aa42f33b83b3feb.js

293 ms

Form.min-7c9890b86217493202251e81b961839d.js

Form.min-7c9890b86217493202251e81b961839d.js

294 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

79 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

172 ms

icon-library.svg

icon-library.svg

250 ms

placeholder-stage.gif

placeholder-stage.gif

279 ms

HOMAG-India-night.jpg

HOMAG-India-night.jpg

812 ms

portrait-contact-popup.jpg

portrait-contact-popup.jpg

421 ms

duerr_logo.png

duerr_logo.png

296 ms

13662e2c-207f-4adf-b653-087bed4598fa.woff

13662e2c-207f-4adf-b653-087bed4598fa.woff

290 ms

e57f85d3-142e-4bcd-9c37-aecee01d5eed.woff

e57f85d3-142e-4bcd-9c37-aecee01d5eed.woff

370 ms

44dd2ede-66b5-43b1-b67e-e3ba9331d4ea.woff

44dd2ede-66b5-43b1-b67e-e3ba9331d4ea.woff

325 ms

Accessibility Review

homag.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes are not valid or misspelled

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

homag.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

homag.com SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Homag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Homag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

homag.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of HOMAG. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: