Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

honeymoon.style

Honeymoon Style | Honeymoon Destinations | Honeymoon Packages

Page Load Speed

11.6 sec in total

First Response

227 ms

Resources Loaded

10.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

honeymoon.style screenshot

About Website

Visit honeymoon.style now to see the best up-to-date Honeymoon content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about honeymoon.style

Our free honeymoon planning website helps you find amazing romantic resorts, exclusive deals for couples and ensures you get the best price for your honeymoon.

Visit honeymoon.style

Key Findings

We analyzed Honeymoon.style page load time and found that the first response time was 227 ms and then it took 11.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

honeymoon.style performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,780 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.019

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.5 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

honeymoon.style

227 ms

www.honeymoon.style

1506 ms

calendar-win2k-1.css

110 ms

menu.css

285 ms

menu.css

264 ms

Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Honeymoon.style, 8% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Honeymoon.style.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (57%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Honeymoon.style main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 275.0 kB

  • Original 314.5 kB
  • After minification 314.5 kB
  • After compression 39.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 275.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 937.8 kB
  • After minification 928.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Honeymoon images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 811.7 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 847.4 kB
  • After compression 264.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 811.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 640.9 kB

  • Original 736.4 kB
  • After minification 602.1 kB
  • After compression 95.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Honeymoon.style needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 640.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 82 (80%)

Requests Now

103

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 103 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Honeymoon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 59 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

honeymoon.style accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

honeymoon.style best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

honeymoon.style SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Honeymoon.style can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Honeymoon.style main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Honeymoon. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: