3.9 sec in total
196 ms
3.1 sec
543 ms
Visit hook.design now to see the best up-to-date Hook content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hook.design
We are a full service creative digital agency offering website design, graphic design & branding, digital marketing, print design and much more.
Visit hook.designWe analyzed Hook.design page load time and found that the first response time was 196 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
hook.design performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value9.7 s
10/100
10%
Value2,040 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.342
33/100
15%
Value12.7 s
14/100
10%
196 ms
491 ms
490 ms
460 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Hook.design, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Hook.design.
Page size can be reduced by 153.1 kB (16%)
939.8 kB
786.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Hook.design main page is 939.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 583.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 138.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 761 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hook needs image optimization as it can save up to 761 B or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 7.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hook.design has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (93%)
74
5
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hook. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hook.design
196 ms
hook.design
491 ms
style.min.css
490 ms
styles.css
460 ms
settings.css
26 ms
style.css
470 ms
style.css
467 ms
modules.min.css
59 ms
dripicons.css
108 ms
style.min.css
522 ms
fontawesome-all.min.css
110 ms
ionicons.min.css
117 ms
style.css
129 ms
style.css
144 ms
simple-line-icons.css
152 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
161 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
182 ms
style_dynamic.css
193 ms
modules-responsive.min.css
211 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
229 ms
css
40 ms
front.min.css
240 ms
js_composer.min.css
833 ms
jquery.min.js
924 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
939 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
998 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
970 ms
front.min.js
951 ms
js
102 ms
js
49 ms
animate.min.css
777 ms
scripts.js
778 ms
api.js
45 ms
core.min.js
781 ms
tabs.min.js
790 ms
accordion.min.js
810 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
837 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
1276 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
844 ms
jquery.appear.js
1341 ms
modernizr.min.js
855 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
1526 ms
jquery.plugin.js
872 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1575 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
880 ms
fluidvids.min.js
887 ms
perfect-scrollbar.jquery.min.js
949 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
1548 ms
parallax.min.js
924 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
917 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
908 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
889 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
940 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
921 ms
swiper.min.js
906 ms
slick.min.js
894 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
749 ms
snap.svg-min.js
742 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
739 ms
counter.js
716 ms
absoluteCounter.min.js
687 ms
typed.js
411 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
412 ms
easypiechart.js
412 ms
curtain.js
409 ms
jquery.multiscroll.min.js
401 ms
modules.min.js
456 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
435 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
690 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
1029 ms
xfbml.customerchat.js
103 ms
analytics.js
94 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEw.woff
111 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlEw.woff
335 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedA.woff
387 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEw.woff
574 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
688 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
686 ms
dripicons-v2.woff
682 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
684 ms
recaptcha__en.js
560 ms
collect
278 ms
collect
537 ms
the-hook-1.png
421 ms
213 ms
hook.design accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
hook.design best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
hook.design SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hook.design can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hook.design main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hook.design
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hook. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: