Tools & Wizards About Us
hoopaughgrading.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

hoopaughgrading.com

Hoopaugh Grading | Full-Service Sitework Contractor | CLT

Page Load Speed

870 ms in total

First Response

44 ms

Resources Loaded

658 ms

Page Rendered

168 ms

hoopaughgrading.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to hoopaughgrading.com homepage info - get ready to check Hoopaugh Grading best content right away, or after learning these important things about hoopaughgrading.com

Hoopaugh Grading Company is a licensed full-service sitework contractor specializing in site development and commercial grading in North and South Carolina.

Visit hoopaughgrading.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Hoopaughgrading.com page load time and found that the first response time was 44 ms and then it took 826 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hoopaughgrading.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

59/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,720 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hoopaughgrading.com

44 ms

hoopaughgrading.com

41 ms

css

99 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

20 ms

dripicons.min.css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Hoopaughgrading.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (358 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.userway.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 254.7 kB (4%)

Content Size

6.7 MB

After Optimization

6.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hoopaughgrading.com main page is 6.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 134.7 kB

  • Original 161.0 kB
  • After minification 155.6 kB
  • After compression 26.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 134.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 767 B

  • Original 5.9 MB
  • After minification 5.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hoopaugh Grading images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 80.9 kB

  • Original 361.2 kB
  • After minification 361.2 kB
  • After compression 280.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 80.9 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 38.3 kB

  • Original 256.4 kB
  • After minification 255.6 kB
  • After compression 218.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hoopaughgrading.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.3 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (84%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hoopaugh Grading. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

hoopaughgrading.com

hoopaughgrading.com

44 ms

hoopaughgrading.com

hoopaughgrading.com

41 ms

css

css

99 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

sbi-styles.min.css

20 ms

dripicons.min.css

dripicons.min.css

32 ms

elegant-icons.min.css

elegant-icons.min.css

45 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

33 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

39 ms

linea-icons.min.css

linea-icons.min.css

42 ms

linear-icons.min.css

linear-icons.min.css

52 ms

icon

icon

155 ms

simple-line-icons.min.css

simple-line-icons.min.css

52 ms

sb-youtube.min.css

sb-youtube.min.css

53 ms

grid.min.css

grid.min.css

46 ms

helper-parts.min.css

helper-parts.min.css

49 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

113 ms

perfect-scrollbar.css

perfect-scrollbar.css

73 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

59 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

59 ms

cyberdom-core.min.css

cyberdom-core.min.css

74 ms

style.css

style.css

57 ms

grid.min.css

grid.min.css

123 ms

style.css

style.css

136 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

103 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

108 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

102 ms

fadeIn.min.css

fadeIn.min.css

134 ms

elementor.min.css

elementor.min.css

139 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

140 ms

post-8.css

post-8.css

135 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

139 ms

global.css

global.css

136 ms

jquery.multiscroll.css

jquery.multiscroll.css

140 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

141 ms

post-1453.css

post-1453.css

145 ms

post-9155.css

post-9155.css

142 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

146 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

143 ms

js

js

213 ms

widget.js

widget.js

358 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

141 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

142 ms

perfect-scrollbar.jquery.min.js

perfect-scrollbar.jquery.min.js

193 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

178 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

178 ms

jquery.parallax-scroll.js

jquery.parallax-scroll.js

174 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

172 ms

cyberdom-core.min.js

cyberdom-core.min.js

174 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

166 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

167 ms

jquery.multiscroll.min.js

jquery.multiscroll.min.js

167 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

163 ms

dropdown.js

dropdown.js

168 ms

jquery.lineProgressbar.js

jquery.lineProgressbar.js

165 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

147 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

149 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

146 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

120 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

115 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

129 ms

elementor.min.js

elementor.min.js

117 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

105 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

106 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

104 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

104 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

177 ms

events.js

events.js

242 ms

twitterX.png

twitterX.png

226 ms

sbi-sprite.png

sbi-sprite.png

184 ms

font

font

218 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

102 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

170 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

83 ms

main-logo.png

main-logo.png

169 ms

Hoopaugh-Grading_Logo-White-Red.png

Hoopaugh-Grading_Logo-White-Red.png

171 ms

white-logo.png

white-logo.png

172 ms

2.png

2.png

241 ms

DJI_0001-min.jpg

DJI_0001-min.jpg

174 ms

Teammate-Group-picture.jpg

Teammate-Group-picture.jpg

173 ms

hgc_training_academy_with-logo.png

hgc_training_academy_with-logo.png

184 ms

60d3877390314a5163076ab4_logo-hoopaugh.png

60d3877390314a5163076ab4_logo-hoopaugh.png

172 ms

widget_app_1730455764190.js

widget_app_1730455764190.js

131 ms

main.MTJhNGMzN2YwMA.js

main.MTJhNGMzN2YwMA.js

70 ms

Accessibility Review

hoopaughgrading.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

hoopaughgrading.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

hoopaughgrading.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hoopaughgrading.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hoopaughgrading.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hoopaughgrading.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hoopaugh Grading. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: