Tools & Wizards About Us
horrorasylum.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

horrorasylum.com

Asylumedia – Web Development | Social Media | Digital Content – Web Development, Social Media & Digital Content

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

87 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

horrorasylum.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Horrorasylum content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about horrorasylum.com

Your Digital Partner. Find Out More WEB DEVELOPMENT, SOCIAL MEDIA & DIGITAL CONTENT Web, Social & Digital Services We’re your partners in navigating the ever-evolving digital landscape. Embark on a di...

Visit horrorasylum.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Horrorasylum.com page load time and found that the first response time was 87 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

horrorasylum.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value690 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.042

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

horrorasylum.com

87 ms

www.horror-asylum.com

1153 ms

cookie-bar.css

189 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

271 ms

frontend.min.css

364 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Horrorasylum.com, 82% (41 requests) were made to Horror-asylum.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Horror-asylum.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 496.6 kB (29%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Horrorasylum.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 145.8 kB

  • Original 172.4 kB
  • After minification 163.9 kB
  • After compression 26.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 145.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 344.5 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 738.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Horrorasylum needs image optimization as it can save up to 344.5 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 383.5 kB
  • After minification 383.5 kB
  • After compression 381.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 86.2 kB
  • After minification 86.2 kB
  • After compression 81.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Horrorasylum.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (73%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Horrorasylum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

horrorasylum.com

horrorasylum.com

87 ms

www.horror-asylum.com

www.horror-asylum.com

1153 ms

cookie-bar.css

cookie-bar.css

189 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

271 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

364 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

278 ms

post-111049.css

post-111049.css

280 ms

post-109772.css

post-109772.css

281 ms

style.css

style.css

387 ms

font-3d7a7f29208231d16b7e865b1f62683d.css

font-3d7a7f29208231d16b7e865b1f62683d.css

360 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

373 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

374 ms

icons.css

icons.css

378 ms

skin-classic.css

skin-classic.css

453 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

458 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

470 ms

cookie-bar.js

cookie-bar.js

472 ms

js

js

60 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

110 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

515 ms

classic-slider.css

classic-slider.css

513 ms

lazyload.js

lazyload.js

513 ms

jquery.mfp-lightbox.js

jquery.mfp-lightbox.js

513 ms

theme.js

theme.js

597 ms

jquery.sticky-sidebar.js

jquery.sticky-sidebar.js

513 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

598 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

598 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

676 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

597 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

600 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

658 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

683 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

689 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

691 ms

dc.js

dc.js

142 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

142 ms

HA-Logo-Transparent-BlackLett-300dpi-SMALL-700px.png

HA-Logo-Transparent-BlackLett-300dpi-SMALL-700px.png

459 ms

svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB2aWV3Qm94PScwIDAgMSAxJyB4bWxucz0naHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmcnPjwvc3ZnPg==

svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB2aWV3Qm94PScwIDAgMSAxJyB4bWxucz0naHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmcnPjwvc3ZnPg==

872 ms

social-influence.jpg

social-influence.jpg

442 ms

vampires-banner.jpg

vampires-banner.jpg

384 ms

werewolves-banner.jpg

werewolves-banner.jpg

461 ms

HA-Logo-Transparent-WhiteLett-300dpi-150px.png

HA-Logo-Transparent-WhiteLett-300dpi-150px.png

384 ms

Untitled-design-37.png

Untitled-design-37.png

627 ms

C97C8921-C809-4670-88F4-A40A73FC72EB.png

C97C8921-C809-4670-88F4-A40A73FC72EB.png

864 ms

Home-Bottom-BTTM.jpg

Home-Bottom-BTTM.jpg

534 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

252 ms

ts-icons.woff

ts-icons.woff

444 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

32 ms

ads

ads

39 ms

Accessibility Review

horrorasylum.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

horrorasylum.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

horrorasylum.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Horrorasylum.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Horrorasylum.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

horrorasylum.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Horrorasylum. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: