10.9 sec in total
562 ms
10.2 sec
140 ms
Welcome to hosebelt.com homepage info - get ready to check Hosebelt best content right away, or after learning these important things about hosebelt.com
Shuangma Rubber Co., Ltd
Visit hosebelt.comWe analyzed Hosebelt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 562 ms and then it took 10.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
hosebelt.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value4.3 s
43/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.8 s
79/100
10%
562 ms
284 ms
149 ms
218 ms
230 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Hosebelt.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Count24.51yes.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Shuangma.chinaifactory.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.6 sec) relates to the external source Count24.51yes.com.
Page size can be reduced by 128.9 kB (17%)
775.7 kB
646.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Hosebelt.com main page is 775.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 589.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hosebelt images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 88.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 88.7 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hosebelt.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (60%)
45
18
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hosebelt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hosebelt.com
562 ms
jquery.js
284 ms
lang.js
149 ms
base.js
218 ms
yav.js
230 ms
yav_config.js
155 ms
mainmenu.js
156 ms
catelog.js
224 ms
flash.js
230 ms
delmargin.js
233 ms
reset.css
301 ms
body.css
302 ms
style.css
306 ms
hotblock.css
307 ms
click.aspx
9605 ms
b5ba152a-ce09-4eb5-b183-3ac18b17c6a4-org.jpg
812 ms
bg_body.png
76 ms
home.png
73 ms
email.png
78 ms
tel.png
78 ms
lang.png
73 ms
cn.gif
79 ms
logo.jpg
144 ms
bg_form.png
145 ms
bg_bottom.png
157 ms
left.png
156 ms
right.png
157 ms
navli.png
156 ms
banner1.jpg
426 ms
banner2.jpg
432 ms
banner3.jpg
381 ms
bg_pg.png
236 ms
bg_left.png
235 ms
title_procata.png
236 ms
menu_close.gif
311 ms
ahov.png
311 ms
menu_open.gif
311 ms
title_sub.png
387 ms
bg_submit.png
388 ms
online.jpg
466 ms
redarrow.png
456 ms
bf6cb40d-8beb-4323-a342-d503a4d48814-small.jpg
464 ms
dd0d274f-8b84-4629-873a-b67443b7962d-small.jpg
465 ms
42-c3c297cb-5709-4e57-b820-08f864e43d9c-small.jpg
495 ms
099a4f9a-da5b-4db4-8624-9e9989f06a1d-small.jpg
503 ms
705d4aad-a250-4656-9b5b-e0bbdd1b12d6.jpg
530 ms
ga.js
11 ms
hosebelt.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
hosebelt.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
hosebelt.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hosebelt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Hosebelt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hosebelt.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hosebelt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: