Tools & Wizards About Us
hospitall.tech screenshot

Report Summary

  • 93

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

hospitall.tech

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

52 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

120 ms

hospitall.tech screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Hospitall content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hospitall.tech

Site will be available soon. Thank you for your patience!

Visit hospitall.tech

Key Findings

We analyzed Hospitall.tech page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hospitall.tech performance score

93

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

87/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

89/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.057

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hospitall.tech

52 ms

hospitall.tech

2118 ms

style.css

37 ms

fonts.css

60 ms

css

16 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Hospitall.tech, 55% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.bunny.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Hospitall.tech.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 17.6 kB (8%)

Content Size

232.0 kB

After Optimization

214.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hospitall.tech main page is 232.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 163.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 5.9 kB
  • After minification 5.8 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 163.5 kB
  • After minification 163.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hospitall images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 147 B

  • Original 35.9 kB
  • After minification 35.9 kB
  • After compression 35.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 13.4 kB

  • Original 26.7 kB
  • After minification 23.5 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hospitall.tech needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.4 kB or 50% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hospitall. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

hospitall.tech

hospitall.tech

52 ms

hospitall.tech

hospitall.tech

2118 ms

style.css

style.css

37 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

60 ms

css

css

16 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

68 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

66 ms

jquery.frontend.js

jquery.frontend.js

86 ms

mt-sample-background.jpg

mt-sample-background.jpg

194 ms

open-sans-cyrillic-ext-400-normal.woff

open-sans-cyrillic-ext-400-normal.woff

2 ms

open-sans-vietnamese-400-normal.woff

open-sans-vietnamese-400-normal.woff

5 ms

open-sans-latin-ext-400-normal.woff

open-sans-latin-ext-400-normal.woff

6 ms

open-sans-greek-ext-400-normal.woff

open-sans-greek-ext-400-normal.woff

8 ms

open-sans-cyrillic-400-normal.woff

open-sans-cyrillic-400-normal.woff

8 ms

open-sans-symbols-400-normal.woff

open-sans-symbols-400-normal.woff

7 ms

open-sans-hebrew-400-normal.woff

open-sans-hebrew-400-normal.woff

7 ms

open-sans-latin-400-normal.woff

open-sans-latin-400-normal.woff

8 ms

open-sans-greek-400-normal.woff

open-sans-greek-400-normal.woff

9 ms

open-sans-math-400-normal.woff

open-sans-math-400-normal.woff

13 ms

foundation-icons.woff

foundation-icons.woff

42 ms

Accessibility Review

hospitall.tech accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

hospitall.tech best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

hospitall.tech SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hospitall.tech can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Hospitall.tech main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hospitall.tech

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hospitall. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: