Tools & Wizards About Us
hospitals.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

hospitals.net

Hospital compare - Find best hospitals in your area

Page Load Speed

11.8 sec in total

First Response

66 ms

Resources Loaded

11.2 sec

Page Rendered

475 ms

hospitals.net screenshot

About Website

Visit hospitals.net now to see the best up-to-date Hospital S content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hospitals.net

Find the best hospitals in your area and compare them. This Hospital Compare site allows you to find quality information about doctors, hospitals, services and specialties.

Visit hospitals.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Hospitals.net page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 11.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hospitals.net performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

45/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.1 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hospitals.net

66 ms

hospitals.net

10640 ms

14e4d86e519e39ac794f249298b5f740.css

64 ms

client

147 ms

sdk.js

16 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Hospitals.net, 9% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net and 4% (1 request) were made to Accounts.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Hospitals.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 230.0 kB (25%)

Content Size

919.5 kB

After Optimization

689.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hospitals.net main page is 919.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 486.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 204.9 kB

  • Original 265.9 kB
  • After minification 265.6 kB
  • After compression 61.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 204.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 25.0 kB

  • Original 486.4 kB
  • After minification 461.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hospital S images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 167.2 kB
  • After minification 167.2 kB
  • After compression 167.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hospitals.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hospital S. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

hospitals.net

hospitals.net

66 ms

hospitals.net

hospitals.net

10640 ms

14e4d86e519e39ac794f249298b5f740.css

14e4d86e519e39ac794f249298b5f740.css

64 ms

client

client

147 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

16 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

16 ms

01_Home.png

01_Home.png

21 ms

6bf407d27842391bbcd90343624e694b.svg

6bf407d27842391bbcd90343624e694b.svg

264 ms

theme-icons.woff

theme-icons.woff

26 ms

facebook-icon.png

facebook-icon.png

37 ms

logo50x50.png

logo50x50.png

19 ms

male_doctor-1.png

male_doctor-1.png

25 ms

female_doctor-1.png

female_doctor-1.png

35 ms

nurse.png

nurse.png

50 ms

3-1.png

3-1.png

40 ms

info.png

info.png

40 ms

au-nsw-sydney-st-george-private-hospital-suite-3a-level-3-1-south-street-1.jpg

au-nsw-sydney-st-george-private-hospital-suite-3a-level-3-1-south-street-1.jpg

37 ms

1.png

1.png

50 ms

2.png

2.png

61 ms

4.png

4.png

49 ms

3.png

3.png

53 ms

5.png

5.png

64 ms

help.png

help.png

64 ms

Accessibility Review

hospitals.net accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best Practices

hospitals.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

hospitals.net SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hospitals.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hospitals.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hospitals.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hospital S. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: