Tools & Wizards About Us
hostchive.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

hostchive.com

Index of /

Page Load Speed

482 ms in total

First Response

127 ms

Resources Loaded

263 ms

Page Rendered

92 ms

hostchive.com screenshot

About Website

Visit hostchive.com now to see the best up-to-date Hostchive content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hostchive.com

Visit hostchive.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Hostchive.com page load time and found that the first response time was 127 ms and then it took 355 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hostchive.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.0 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hostchive.com

127 ms

autoindex.css

36 ms

tablesort.js

67 ms

tablesort.number.js

69 ms

folder-fill.svg

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Hostchive.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (127 ms) belongs to the original domain Hostchive.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 kB (30%)

Content Size

5.3 kB

After Optimization

3.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hostchive.com main page is 5.3 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 726 B

  • Original 1.3 kB
  • After minification 1.3 kB
  • After compression 608 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 726 B or 54% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 854 B

  • Original 2.7 kB
  • After minification 2.7 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 854 B or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hostchive. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

hostchive.com

hostchive.com

127 ms

autoindex.css

autoindex.css

36 ms

tablesort.js

tablesort.js

67 ms

tablesort.number.js

tablesort.number.js

69 ms

folder-fill.svg

folder-fill.svg

35 ms

Accessibility Review

hostchive.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

hostchive.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

hostchive.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hostchive.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Hostchive.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hostchive.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hostchive. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: