Tools & Wizards About Us
hosting1.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

hosting1.in

Web Hosting India | Best Website Hosting Services Company India | Hosting1.in

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

70 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

892 ms

hosting1.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to hosting1.in homepage info - get ready to check Hosting1 best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about hosting1.in

Web Hosting India - Hosting1 is a Best Web Hosting Service Company in India. Our Services include are Linux web hosting, Windows web hosting, Shared web Hosting, Reseller web Hosting, VPS web Hosting,...

Visit hosting1.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Hosting1.in page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hosting1.in performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value760 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hosting1.in

70 ms

hosting1.in

596 ms

css2

34 ms

css2

50 ms

bootstrap.min.css

148 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Hosting1.in, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (609 ms) relates to the external source Projectdev.seawindsolution.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (76%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

584.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hosting1.in main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 185.4 kB

  • Original 204.5 kB
  • After minification 147.3 kB
  • After compression 19.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 57.2 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 185.4 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 188.3 kB
  • After minification 179.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hosting1 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 589.6 kB

  • Original 826.3 kB
  • After minification 808.1 kB
  • After compression 236.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 589.6 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 791.4 kB
  • After compression 149.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hosting1.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (79%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hosting1. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

hosting1.in

hosting1.in

70 ms

hosting1.in

hosting1.in

596 ms

css2

css2

34 ms

css2

css2

50 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

148 ms

animate.css

animate.css

108 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

66 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

111 ms

icheck-material.min.css

icheck-material.min.css

99 ms

icofont.css

icofont.css

154 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

105 ms

OverlayScrollbars.min.css

OverlayScrollbars.min.css

112 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

128 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

129 ms

slick.css

slick.css

129 ms

js

js

74 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

155 ms

styles.css

styles.css

147 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

148 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

149 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

152 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

172 ms

style.css

style.css

218 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

198 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

169 ms

post-235.css

post-235.css

172 ms

global.css

global.css

175 ms

css

css

24 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

212 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

191 ms

jquery-3.5.0.min.js

jquery-3.5.0.min.js

141 ms

modernizr-3.7.1.min.js

modernizr-3.7.1.min.js

124 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

138 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

354 ms

jquery-migrate-3.3.0.min.js

jquery-migrate-3.3.0.min.js

353 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

354 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

354 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

354 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

354 ms

jquery.overlayScrollbars.min.js

jquery.overlayScrollbars.min.js

355 ms

jquery.scrollUp.min.js

jquery.scrollUp.min.js

355 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

359 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

357 ms

wow.js

wow.js

351 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

349 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

346 ms

simplyCountdown.min.js

simplyCountdown.min.js

345 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

332 ms

app.js

app.js

331 ms

index.js

index.js

330 ms

index.js

index.js

307 ms

rmp-menu.min.js

rmp-menu.min.js

294 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

294 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

294 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

295 ms

splc-script.min.js

splc-script.min.js

291 ms

hi.png

hi.png

550 ms

ft-icon.png

ft-icon.png

609 ms

brand-1.png

brand-1.png

113 ms

brand-4.png

brand-4.png

113 ms

brand-5.png

brand-5.png

112 ms

brand-3.png

brand-3.png

111 ms

brand-6.png

brand-6.png

113 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

362 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

489 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

490 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

490 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

491 ms

icofont.woff

icofont.woff

362 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

361 ms

logo.png

logo.png

389 ms

s-21.png

s-21.png

389 ms

live-chat.png

live-chat.png

390 ms

slider-02.png

slider-02.png

390 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

436 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

229 ms

s-23.png

s-23.png

23 ms

Accessibility Review

hosting1.in accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

hosting1.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

hosting1.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hosting1.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hosting1.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hosting1.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hosting1. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: