2.5 sec in total
215 ms
1.9 sec
434 ms
Visit hostingcharges.in now to see the best up-to-date Hosting Charges content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hostingcharges.in
Compare Best rated Hosting companies, Web Designing, Digital marketing services & so on. Read/Write reviews, Coupons, guides and more
Visit hostingcharges.inWe analyzed Hostingcharges.in page load time and found that the first response time was 215 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
hostingcharges.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
13/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value7.8 s
24/100
10%
Value700 ms
43/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.0 s
12/100
10%
215 ms
725 ms
334 ms
269 ms
437 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Hostingcharges.in, 3% (2 requests) were made to Images.dmca.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (725 ms) belongs to the original domain Hostingcharges.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (76%)
2.3 MB
553.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Hostingcharges.in main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 85.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.9 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 103.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hosting Charges needs image optimization as it can save up to 103.1 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 185.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hostingcharges.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 185.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (39%)
59
36
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hosting Charges. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hostingcharges.in
215 ms
www.hostingcharges.in
725 ms
style.css
334 ms
font-awesome.min.css
269 ms
bootstrap.min.css
437 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.js
342 ms
platform.js
55 ms
WebResource.axd
269 ms
WebResource.axd
269 ms
ScriptResource.axd
432 ms
ScriptResource.axd
278 ms
jquery-1.8.2.js
533 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.24.js
598 ms
ScriptResource.axd
344 ms
ScriptResource.axd
345 ms
ScriptResource.axd
449 ms
ScriptResource.axd
448 ms
ScriptResource.axd
463 ms
ScriptResource.axd
475 ms
ScriptResource.axd
478 ms
ScriptResource.axd
479 ms
ScriptResource.axd
505 ms
ScriptResource.axd
549 ms
DMCABadgeHelper.min.js
6 ms
jquery.min.js
505 ms
bootstrap.min.js
364 ms
analytics.js
40 ms
InMotion_14.jpg
69 ms
dmca_protected_sml_120m.png
37 ms
hosting-charges-logo.jpg
173 ms
wordpress.jpg
221 ms
linux.jpg
220 ms
windows.jpg
237 ms
java.jpg
264 ms
php.jpg
265 ms
joomla.jpg
334 ms
shared.gif
336 ms
vps-03.gif
337 ms
vps.gif
336 ms
vps-04.gif
337 ms
vps-05.gif
366 ms
_Blog_18_18.jpg
366 ms
_Blog_15_15.jpg
375 ms
_Blog_17_17.jpg
378 ms
iPage_20.png
134 ms
Hosting%20Ra_6.jpg
135 ms
eHost_21.png
136 ms
Bluehost_4.jpg
138 ms
HostGator_2.png
136 ms
BigRock_3.jpg
138 ms
Arvixe_23.png
213 ms
JustHost_5.jpg
215 ms
Znetlive_13.png
215 ms
collect
13 ms
InMotion_14.jpg
321 ms
iPage_20.png
262 ms
Hosting%20Ra_6.jpg
277 ms
eHost_21.png
276 ms
HostGator_2.png
363 ms
Bluehost_4.jpg
305 ms
BigRock_3.jpg
309 ms
Arvixe_23.png
246 ms
JustHost_5.jpg
271 ms
Znetlive_13.png
263 ms
sdk.js
116 ms
review-banner.jpg
387 ms
sprite.png
298 ms
FilledStar.png
304 ms
EmptyStar.png
326 ms
roboto-light-webfont.woff
300 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
323 ms
roboto-medium-webfont.woff
350 ms
roboto-regular-webfont.woff
348 ms
roboto-thin-webfont.woff
366 ms
WebRupee.V2.0.woff
385 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
401 ms
44 ms
xd_arbiter.php
58 ms
xd_arbiter.php
138 ms
hostingcharges.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hostingcharges.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
hostingcharges.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hostingcharges.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hostingcharges.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hostingcharges.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hosting Charges. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: