2.8 sec in total
200 ms
1.9 sec
692 ms
Visit hostings.info now to see the best up-to-date Hostings content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hostings.info
Reliable hosting advice. Ratings by various tests, user (1138) and expert (6) reviews. No bots. No bollocks.
Visit hostings.infoWe analyzed Hostings.info page load time and found that the first response time was 200 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
hostings.info performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value3.2 s
73/100
25%
Value6.2 s
44/100
10%
Value1,340 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value11.2 s
20/100
10%
200 ms
861 ms
48 ms
35 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Hostings.info, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (861 ms) belongs to the original domain Hostings.info.
Page size can be reduced by 113.1 kB (22%)
514.1 kB
401.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Hostings.info main page is 514.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 215.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 104.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hostings images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 919 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hostings.info has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (52%)
71
34
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hostings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hostings.info
200 ms
hostings.info
861 ms
bootstrap.min.css
48 ms
css
35 ms
css
55 ms
font-awesome.min.css
45 ms
styles.css
29 ms
jquery.formstyler.css
38 ms
horizon-swiper.min.css
58 ms
style.css
68 ms
APlayer.min.css
52 ms
audioplayer.css
58 ms
a3e70a5021089181ae54711b69e8ff1f.png
114 ms
f535a1f2b376aa02e108d8de34e31f2b20.png
113 ms
4d546eb15c8d07da953d20d8c0812f3f20.png
112 ms
rocket-loader.min.js
60 ms
ba14002427763417eb9d8559387b054720.png
114 ms
731395eca96f90628f42db012af84281.png
115 ms
5828e5b2cf721573320679180993f936.png
115 ms
jquery.min.js
121 ms
jquery-ui.js
114 ms
bootstrap.min.js
111 ms
jquery.formstyler.min.js
112 ms
jquery.sticky.js
113 ms
jquery.barrating.js
115 ms
horizon-swiper.js
118 ms
jquery.nav.js
117 ms
jquery.ellipsis.js
157 ms
owl.carousel.js
128 ms
owl.carousel.css
120 ms
owl.theme.default.css
185 ms
summernote.css
127 ms
summernote.js
156 ms
summernote-ru-RU.js
143 ms
APlayer.min.js
155 ms
custom.js
157 ms
shoorik.js
183 ms
max.js
194 ms
compare.js
182 ms
lebrezzy.js
180 ms
typeahead.bundle.js
167 ms
ajax_lazy_loading.js
159 ms
filter.js
163 ms
change_currency.js
164 ms
gtm.js
63 ms
change_empty_avatars.js
109 ms
6e0412e801971680a2a6.jpg
304 ms
ce30e8c6be3f5c417c1c.jpg
301 ms
7ac63e5ba2981fef0646.jpg
302 ms
jizaRExUiTo99u79D0aEwA.ttf
37 ms
jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0OqtKA.ttf
48 ms
29e88fb261910cf07f4c.jpg
299 ms
2c3aacfea78c9bc06a31.jpg
300 ms
5a7ed5cf3520bf36dd59.jpg
300 ms
08e12e22bd71e0724f51.jpg
300 ms
082fe81026fc4917804f.jpg
297 ms
f1c279e13aa7ef7f857d.jpg
299 ms
79db92136e20c3946b82.jpg
298 ms
0fc9ed03c93d85baec9d.jpg
300 ms
ab1f0a6ba2cad6cc9203.jpg
297 ms
dff8a06c75e897c5b0ea.jpg
297 ms
recomend.png
294 ms
32bdc8a011348923aa609511badb2e9a42.png
295 ms
725f988bbf9f119f2b3a62a7c4d3f80942.png
294 ms
fe7cd1b52c0ffdcf298886d4f8b0cf6e42.png
300 ms
0f9e506a2c1de9b89a546530950bb50742.png
292 ms
e25542940884542cdf3be0ffdd8b9c3a42.png
293 ms
b04a1de03c307f7559bbb612a5aba34342.png
285 ms
264fc3be0c97cb8bb3c984a4444e6dec42.png
284 ms
b3c9cb9abfbd9b83d70d4df0e27e09c542.jpg
272 ms
43bf038c6de3dcb59e8a5968ccc3f47342.png
258 ms
a962006245cf38f82d9f2d745402e74242.png
257 ms
best-host.png
257 ms
user-ava-empty.png
171 ms
BngRUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsbCCwRg.ttf
74 ms
BngSUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsbg95AiBW_g.ttf
160 ms
iconi-font.woff
158 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
159 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
312 ms
jizYRExUiTo99u79D0e0w8mN.ttf
159 ms
jizdRExUiTo99u79D0e8fOydKxUY.ttf
160 ms
jquery.min.js
58 ms
hostings.info accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
hostings.info best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
hostings.info SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hostings.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hostings.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hostings.info
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hostings. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: