8 sec in total
1.9 sec
6 sec
139 ms
Visit hostpinger.com now to see the best up-to-date Hostpinger content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hostpinger.com
Monitor your Website, Servers, Networks, Local Host, Hardware, and Cloud Systems & Applications. Try our FREE subscription and ENJOY 50 TESTS ABSOLUTELY FREE. When your website is down, Hostpinger ale...
Visit hostpinger.comWe analyzed Hostpinger.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
hostpinger.com performance score
1863 ms
1384 ms
690 ms
691 ms
920 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Hostpinger.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Eway.com.au. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Hostpinger.com.
Page size can be reduced by 715.7 kB (76%)
939.5 kB
223.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Hostpinger.com main page is 939.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 614.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.2 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hostpinger needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.6 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 464.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 464.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 201.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hostpinger.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 201.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (58%)
60
25
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hostpinger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hostpinger.com
1863 ms
jquery-1.7.min.js
1384 ms
superfish.js
690 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
691 ms
jquery.mobile.customized.min.js
920 ms
scripts.js
695 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
926 ms
extra_style.css
918 ms
grid_1170.css
1147 ms
styles.css
1847 ms
responsive.css
1375 ms
superfish.css
1147 ms
camera.css
1409 ms
widgets.css
1378 ms
style.css
1378 ms
cloud-zoom.css
1603 ms
prototype.js
2519 ms
ccard.js
1607 ms
validation.js
1609 ms
builder.js
1616 ms
effects.js
2058 ms
dragdrop.js
2062 ms
controls.js
1840 ms
slider.js
1860 ms
js.js
2071 ms
form.js
2074 ms
translate.js
2077 ms
cookies.js
2286 ms
cloud-zoom.1.0.2.min.js
2290 ms
bootstrap.js
2534 ms
msrp.js
2304 ms
analytics.js
40 ms
verified-seal.ashx
272 ms
logo.png
248 ms
tel.png
249 ms
HostPingerGoogle_Play.png
253 ms
HostPingerappstore2.png
250 ms
sf-menu.gif
252 ms
logosmall.png
252 ms
marker-8.gif
477 ms
banner-block-marker.png
479 ms
banner-block-link.png
482 ms
banner-block-2.png
482 ms
bg1.jpg
481 ms
bg2.jpg
478 ms
bg6.jpg
713 ms
yes.png
710 ms
no.png
715 ms
shadow.jpg
713 ms
bg3.jpg
712 ms
bg4.jpg
715 ms
bg5.jpg
944 ms
facebook.png
943 ms
linkedin.png
947 ms
twitter.png
946 ms
google.png
946 ms
banner-block-3.png
933 ms
marker-2.gif
1165 ms
toogle-button.png
1150 ms
collect
13 ms
print.css
235 ms
hostpinger.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hostpinger.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hostpinger.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hostpinger.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hostpinger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: