2.2 sec in total
356 ms
1.3 sec
548 ms
Click here to check amazing Hotels Roanoke content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hotelsroanoke.com
Discover Roanoke hotels for every taste and budget.
Visit hotelsroanoke.comWe analyzed Hotelsroanoke.com page load time and found that the first response time was 356 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
hotelsroanoke.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value10.5 s
0/100
25%
Value4.8 s
67/100
10%
Value390 ms
69/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.5 s
58/100
10%
356 ms
32 ms
49 ms
136 ms
182 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Hotelsroanoke.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (427 ms) belongs to the original domain Hotelsroanoke.com.
Page size can be reduced by 104.5 kB (6%)
1.8 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Hotelsroanoke.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hotels Roanoke images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 26.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hotelsroanoke.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.5 kB or 24% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
33
33
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hotels Roanoke. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
356 ms
css
32 ms
css
49 ms
style.85ec6564fb1a8eee73717e146bb2daa5.css
136 ms
icons-sprite.b087918619c8101c9abf7185804db7bc.svg
182 ms
en.png
116 ms
de.png
180 ms
es.png
104 ms
fr.png
180 ms
it.png
187 ms
nl.png
186 ms
pt.png
189 ms
us.svg
212 ms
piwik.js
204 ms
script.bbfb2b3876d4ddde2a2fe24a356f28ab.js
311 ms
script.bbfb2b3876d4ddde2a2fe24a356f28ab.js
191 ms
payment.a41176d5f58560fcaab384e4ab1fdb68.png
200 ms
122947.JPEG
154 ms
709323046.JPEG
152 ms
1297335310.JPEG
152 ms
709423657.JPEG
218 ms
650394246.JPEG
217 ms
1249558372.JPEG
218 ms
658624536.JPEG
229 ms
1256773816.JPEG
291 ms
1281218554.JPEG
217 ms
1281176143.JPEG
279 ms
1065705748.JPEG
273 ms
1281392251.JPEG
260 ms
816117773.JPEG
337 ms
695180847.JPEG
274 ms
1480936067.JPEG
427 ms
992999572.JPEG
337 ms
po.jpg
326 ms
piwik.php
361 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
17 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
32 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
33 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.ttf
190 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
226 ms
hotelsroanoke.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hotelsroanoke.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
hotelsroanoke.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hotelsroanoke.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hotelsroanoke.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hotelsroanoke.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hotels Roanoke. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: