Tools & Wizards About Us
hover63.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 98

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 39% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

hover63.ru

Ремонт и обслуживание автомобилей

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

860 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

253 ms

hover63.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to hover63.ru homepage info - get ready to check Hover 63 best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about hover63.ru

Visit hover63.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Hover63.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 860 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hover63.ru performance score

98

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hover63.ru

860 ms

style.php

206 ms

openapi.js

360 ms

openapi.js

601 ms

show_ads.js

5 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Hover63.ru, 21% (17 requests) were made to Vk.com and 19% (15 requests) were made to Chatadelic.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Cs629227.vk.me.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 729.0 kB (46%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

855.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hover63.ru main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 774.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 37.4 kB

  • Original 44.8 kB
  • After minification 41.3 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 89.4 kB

  • Original 774.1 kB
  • After minification 684.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hover 63 needs image optimization as it can save up to 89.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 438.0 kB

  • Original 567.9 kB
  • After minification 418.0 kB
  • After compression 129.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 438.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 164.2 kB

  • Original 198.1 kB
  • After minification 167.0 kB
  • After compression 33.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hover63.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 164.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (49%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

39

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hover 63. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

hover63.ru

hover63.ru

860 ms

style.php

style.php

206 ms

openapi.js

openapi.js

360 ms

openapi.js

openapi.js

601 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

5 ms

bg.png

bg.png

1013 ms

frame.php

frame.php

450 ms

topic_read.gif

topic_read.gif

93 ms

icon_topic_latest.gif

icon_topic_latest.gif

180 ms

topic_read_hot.gif

topic_read_hot.gif

181 ms

icon_post_target.gif

icon_post_target.gif

181 ms

icon_topic_attach.gif

icon_topic_attach.gif

181 ms

forum_read.gif

forum_read.gif

183 ms

forum_unread.gif

forum_unread.gif

185 ms

forum_read_locked.gif

forum_read_locked.gif

267 ms

portal_birthday.png

portal_birthday.png

268 ms

portal_members.png

portal_members.png

268 ms

portal_user.png

portal_user.png

268 ms

whosonline.gif

whosonline.gif

274 ms

portal_login.png

portal_login.png

274 ms

portal_custom.png

portal_custom.png

355 ms

portal_links.png

portal_links.png

356 ms

cron.php

cron.php

522 ms

ava2.jpg

ava2.jpg

1160 ms

hover.png

hover.png

903 ms

cellpic33.gif

cellpic33.gif

726 ms

cellpic1.jpg

cellpic1.jpg

724 ms

cellpic2.jpg

cellpic2.jpg

731 ms

ava-default.png

ava-default.png

901 ms

auto2.png

auto2.png

900 ms

auto2.jpg

auto2.jpg

912 ms

upload.gif

upload.gif

260 ms

widget_community.php

widget_community.php

336 ms

ca-pub-3870915087688395.js

ca-pub-3870915087688395.js

42 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

39 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

83 ms

hit;getbb

hit;getbb

265 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

9 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

12 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

22 ms

chat.css

chat.css

131 ms

chat-all-min.js

chat-all-min.js

514 ms

loader_nav19188_3.js

loader_nav19188_3.js

121 ms

lite.css

lite.css

133 ms

lite.js

lite.js

378 ms

lang3_0.js

lang3_0.js

236 ms

widget_community.css

widget_community.css

241 ms

page.css

page.css

409 ms

xdm.js

xdm.js

249 ms

al_community.js

al_community.js

255 ms

page.js

page.js

702 ms

ads

ads

215 ms

osd.js

osd.js

7 ms

hit;getbb

hit;getbb

128 ms

alt1.html

alt1.html

94 ms

hit

hit

254 ms

ajax

ajax

403 ms

QT3JYdQQiMY.jpg

QT3JYdQQiMY.jpg

383 ms

ouDfXCowv-8.jpg

ouDfXCowv-8.jpg

647 ms

WkGZkI67cPY.jpg

WkGZkI67cPY.jpg

644 ms

63KC1QfPZgA.jpg

63KC1QfPZgA.jpg

646 ms

wv0UZTeZ3sY.jpg

wv0UZTeZ3sY.jpg

608 ms

DKsc303CKQE.jpg

DKsc303CKQE.jpg

845 ms

2744.png

2744.png

121 ms

D83DDE99.png

D83DDE99.png

122 ms

TVLGzGepDNI.jpg

TVLGzGepDNI.jpg

1361 ms

w_logo.png

w_logo.png

126 ms

mono_iconset.png

mono_iconset.png

123 ms

hit

hit

128 ms

tleft.png

tleft.png

129 ms

tright.png

tright.png

132 ms

down.png

down.png

255 ms

widget-logo.png

widget-logo.png

256 ms

inputback.gif

inputback.gif

260 ms

register.png

register.png

262 ms

login_providers_small.png

login_providers_small.png

264 ms

1364235938.gif

1364235938.gif

264 ms

1364235796.gif

1364235796.gif

384 ms

1364238731.gif

1364238731.gif

381 ms

1392231610.gif

1392231610.gif

390 ms

Accessibility Review

hover63.ru accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

hover63.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

hover63.ru SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hover63.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hover63.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hover63.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hover 63. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: