Tools & Wizards About Us
howitshouldhaveended.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

howitshouldhaveended.com

How It Should Have Ended

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

82 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

69 ms

howitshouldhaveended.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing How It Should Have Ended content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about howitshouldhaveended.com

How It Should Have Ended is a place for animated parody alternate endings to major motion pictures.

Visit howitshouldhaveended.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Howitshouldhaveended.com page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

howitshouldhaveended.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,540 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.3 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.howitshouldhaveended.com

82 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

99 ms

minified.js

60 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

99 ms

polyfill.min.js

1298 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Howitshouldhaveended.com, 37% (19 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 24% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (49%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Howitshouldhaveended.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 966.4 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 204.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 966.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 709.6 kB
  • After minification 706.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. How It Should Have Ended images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 142.6 kB

  • Original 379.6 kB
  • After minification 379.5 kB
  • After compression 236.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 142.6 kB or 38% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (41%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of How It Should Have Ended. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.howitshouldhaveended.com

www.howitshouldhaveended.com

82 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

99 ms

minified.js

minified.js

60 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

99 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

1298 ms

thunderbolt-commons.4cd1896d.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.4cd1896d.bundle.min.js

83 ms

main.0036c9a3.bundle.min.js

main.0036c9a3.bundle.min.js

85 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

82 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

86 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

83 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

86 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

84 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

84 ms

favicon.png

favicon.png

307 ms

maxresdefault.jpg%202x

maxresdefault.jpg%202x

73 ms

maxresdefault.jpg%202x

maxresdefault.jpg%202x

76 ms

maxresdefault.jpg%202x

maxresdefault.jpg%202x

220 ms

maxresdefault.jpg%202x

maxresdefault.jpg%202x

221 ms

ccf2e9_47d1b5bdf5934f889c3d62cb5a56946b~mv2_d_2942_2206_s_2.jpg

ccf2e9_47d1b5bdf5934f889c3d62cb5a56946b~mv2_d_2942_2206_s_2.jpg

491 ms

ccf2e9_2f49b0dd1cbf46fe91898a4d8825f4b4~mv2_d_2913_2184_s_2.jpg

ccf2e9_2f49b0dd1cbf46fe91898a4d8825f4b4~mv2_d_2913_2184_s_2.jpg

489 ms

ccf2e9_d42e537c01a04fecbd7f787b15da1495~mv2.png

ccf2e9_d42e537c01a04fecbd7f787b15da1495~mv2.png

634 ms

ccf2e9_ecfa04b85b94444e8586606268fded8d~mv2_d_3107_2331_s_2.jpg

ccf2e9_ecfa04b85b94444e8586606268fded8d~mv2_d_3107_2331_s_2.jpg

505 ms

ccf2e9_ecfa04b85b94444e8586606268fded8d~mv2_d_3107_2331_s_2.jpg

ccf2e9_ecfa04b85b94444e8586606268fded8d~mv2_d_3107_2331_s_2.jpg

471 ms

ccf2e9_486d13844be14638a0f50fd69a45b630~mv2_d_2739_2739_s_4_2.jpg

ccf2e9_486d13844be14638a0f50fd69a45b630~mv2_d_2739_2739_s_4_2.jpg

478 ms

ccf2e9_486d13844be14638a0f50fd69a45b630~mv2_d_2739_2739_s_4_2.jpg

ccf2e9_486d13844be14638a0f50fd69a45b630~mv2_d_2739_2739_s_4_2.jpg

590 ms

maxresdefault.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

156 ms

maxresdefault.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

159 ms

maxresdefault.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

159 ms

maxresdefault.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

174 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

139 ms

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

13 ms

61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff

61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff

25 ms

bc176270-17fa-4c78-a343-9fe52824e501.woff

bc176270-17fa-4c78-a343-9fe52824e501.woff

25 ms

07d62b21-8d7a-4c36-be86-d32ab1089972.woff

07d62b21-8d7a-4c36-be86-d32ab1089972.woff

13 ms

a9e95a29-98a7-404a-90ee-1929ad09c696.woff

a9e95a29-98a7-404a-90ee-1929ad09c696.woff

12 ms

107 ms

116 ms

122 ms

118 ms

118 ms

112 ms

137 ms

145 ms

148 ms

146 ms

154 ms

152 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

20 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

32 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

8 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

5 ms

Accessibility Review

howitshouldhaveended.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

howitshouldhaveended.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

howitshouldhaveended.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Howitshouldhaveended.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Howitshouldhaveended.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

howitshouldhaveended.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of How It Should Have Ended. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: