Tools & Wizards About Us
howlndog.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

howlndog.com

Roanoke Web Design Company, web development and custom hosting

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

131 ms

Resources Loaded

867 ms

Page Rendered

147 ms

howlndog.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to howlndog.com homepage info - get ready to check Howlndog best content right away, or after learning these important things about howlndog.com

Website design, graphic design, web site development, WordPress and other hosting, custom programming for web-based technologies using goal-oriented design.

Visit howlndog.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Howlndog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 131 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

howlndog.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

90/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.164

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

howlndog.com

131 ms

styles.css

94 ms

swfobject.js

389 ms

ga.js

35 ms

safe_subscribe_logo.gif

57 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Howlndog.com, 16% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Imgssl.constantcontact.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (389 ms) belongs to the original domain Howlndog.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 14.5 kB (12%)

Content Size

124.2 kB

After Optimization

109.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Howlndog.com main page is 124.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 86.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 9.3 kB
  • After minification 8.2 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.1 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.5 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 87 B

  • Original 86.2 kB
  • After minification 86.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Howlndog images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 24.8 kB
  • After minification 24.5 kB
  • After compression 19.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 3.9 kB
  • After minification 3.1 kB
  • After compression 846 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Howlndog.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (44%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Howlndog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

howlndog.com

howlndog.com

131 ms

styles.css

styles.css

94 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

389 ms

ga.js

ga.js

35 ms

safe_subscribe_logo.gif

safe_subscribe_logo.gif

57 ms

bkgrnd.gif

bkgrnd.gif

54 ms

header-pavlov.jpg

header-pavlov.jpg

191 ms

top-menu-bkgrnd.gif

top-menu-bkgrnd.gif

56 ms

302ColumnTop.gif

302ColumnTop.gif

96 ms

302ColumnBottom.gif

302ColumnBottom.gif

113 ms

main-First.jpg

main-First.jpg

369 ms

312ColumnTop.gif

312ColumnTop.gif

190 ms

312ColumnBottom.gif

312ColumnBottom.gif

191 ms

menu-bullet.gif

menu-bullet.gif

208 ms

tiny-linkedin.gif

tiny-linkedin.gif

215 ms

tiny-facebook-icon.gif

tiny-facebook-icon.gif

342 ms

main-Then.jpg

main-Then.jpg

338 ms

inpage_linkid.js

inpage_linkid.js

5 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

15 ms

Accessibility Review

howlndog.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

howlndog.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

howlndog.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Howlndog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Howlndog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

howlndog.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Howlndog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: