Tools & Wizards About Us
hridc.co.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

hridc.co.in

Haryana Rail Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

256 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

415 ms

hridc.co.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to hridc.co.in homepage info - get ready to check Hridc best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about hridc.co.in

Haryana Rail Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.

Visit hridc.co.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Hridc.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 256 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hridc.co.in performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.6 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value620 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.299

40/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.0 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hridc.co.in

256 ms

hridc.co.in

420 ms

bootstrap.min.css

193 ms

animate.min.css

242 ms

flaticon.css

245 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Hridc.co.in, 13% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (793 ms) belongs to the original domain Hridc.co.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 419.6 kB (8%)

Content Size

5.5 MB

After Optimization

5.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hridc.co.in main page is 5.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 33.2 kB

  • Original 38.2 kB
  • After minification 22.0 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.2 kB, which is 42% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 236.1 kB

  • Original 5.0 MB
  • After minification 4.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hridc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 30.6 kB

  • Original 215.0 kB
  • After minification 215.0 kB
  • After compression 184.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 30.6 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 119.7 kB

  • Original 197.3 kB
  • After minification 177.4 kB
  • After compression 77.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hridc.co.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 119.7 kB or 61% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (67%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hridc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

hridc.co.in

hridc.co.in

256 ms

hridc.co.in

hridc.co.in

420 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

193 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

242 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

245 ms

boxicons.min.css

boxicons.min.css

290 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

315 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

299 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

303 ms

meanmenu.css

meanmenu.css

326 ms

nice-select.min.css

nice-select.min.css

326 ms

style.css

style.css

480 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

418 ms

theme-dark.css

theme-dark.css

428 ms

jquery.min1.js

jquery.min1.js

417 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

425 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

546 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

589 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

604 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

545 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

604 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

604 ms

meanmenu.js

meanmenu.js

642 ms

jquery.nice-select.min.js

jquery.nice-select.min.js

665 ms

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

703 ms

custom.js

custom.js

682 ms

css2

css2

33 ms

css2

css2

50 ms

embed

embed

405 ms

logo.png

logo.png

328 ms

banner--01.jpg

banner--01.jpg

639 ms

banner--02.jpg

banner--02.jpg

763 ms

banner--03.jpg

banner--03.jpg

697 ms

footer-logo.png

footer-logo.png

348 ms

footerlogo-1.jpg

footerlogo-1.jpg

242 ms

footerlogo-2.jpg

footerlogo-2.jpg

337 ms

footerlogo-3.jpg

footerlogo-3.jpg

427 ms

footerlogo-4.jpg

footerlogo-4.jpg

426 ms

bg---01.png

bg---01.png

753 ms

map-world.png

map-world.png

515 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

19 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

30 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

43 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

53 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

54 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

54 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1s.ttf

53 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

571 ms

boxicons.woff

boxicons.woff

793 ms

js

js

35 ms

search.js

search.js

3 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

7 ms

main.js

main.js

10 ms

Accessibility Review

hridc.co.in accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

hridc.co.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

hridc.co.in SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ZX

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hridc.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hridc.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hridc.co.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hridc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: