Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

hsfc.us

High Sierra Fly Casters

Page Load Speed

853 ms in total

First Response

11 ms

Resources Loaded

741 ms

Page Rendered

101 ms

hsfc.us screenshot

About Website

Welcome to hsfc.us homepage info - get ready to check Hsfc best content right away, or after learning these important things about hsfc.us

General information about the High Sierra Fly Casters club.

Visit hsfc.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Hsfc.us page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 842 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hsfc.us performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.159

73/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hsfc.us

11 ms

www.hsfc.us

327 ms

standard-css-microlite-ltr-ltr.css

18 ms

overlay.css

43 ms

allthemes-view.css

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Hsfc.us, 29% (4 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 29% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (327 ms) belongs to the original domain Hsfc.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 221.1 kB (71%)

Content Size

313.5 kB

After Optimization

92.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Hsfc.us main page is 313.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 191.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 17.5 kB

  • Original 25.1 kB
  • After minification 25.0 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 8.2 kB

  • Original 26.8 kB
  • After minification 18.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hsfc needs image optimization as it can save up to 8.2 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 70.1 kB
  • After minification 70.1 kB
  • After compression 38.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 163.4 kB

  • Original 191.5 kB
  • After minification 190.6 kB
  • After compression 28.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hsfc.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 163.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hsfc. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

hsfc.us accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

hsfc.us best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

hsfc.us SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hsfc.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Hsfc.us main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hsfc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: