Tools & Wizards About Us
htcare.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 48

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

htcare.us

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

311 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

293 ms

htcare.us screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Htcare content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about htcare.us

The Best Vitamins and Nutrients Supplements, Natural Health & Beauty Products From USA as Gray Hair Treatment,Hair Loss Treatment,Weight Loss Treatment.

Visit htcare.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Htcare.us page load time and found that the first response time was 311 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

htcare.us performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value35.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value47,790 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.156

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value63.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

htcare.us

311 ms

analytics.js

8 ms

style.css

95 ms

css

24 ms

slider.css

138 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Htcare.us, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Static1.dmcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (818 ms) belongs to the original domain Htcare.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (36%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Htcare.us main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 27.3 kB

  • Original 32.0 kB
  • After minification 28.2 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 166.1 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Htcare images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 901.0 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 383.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 901.0 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 278.7 kB

  • Original 334.1 kB
  • After minification 326.8 kB
  • After compression 55.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Htcare.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 278.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (34%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

33

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Htcare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

htcare.us

htcare.us

311 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

8 ms

style.css

style.css

95 ms

css

css

24 ms

slider.css

slider.css

138 ms

jquery-1.9.0.min.js

jquery-1.9.0.min.js

208 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.js

jquery.nivo.slider.js

139 ms

collect

collect

18 ms

x2rrjfa

x2rrjfa

479 ms

GeWbtx5Jy_Q

GeWbtx5Jy_Q

95 ms

default

default

383 ms

header-bg.jpg

header-bg.jpg

201 ms

logo.png

logo.png

132 ms

viewcart.jpg

viewcart.jpg

75 ms

banner2.jpg

banner2.jpg

419 ms

banner1.jpg

banner1.jpg

505 ms

banner3.jpg

banner3.jpg

491 ms

banner4.jpg

banner4.jpg

489 ms

banner5.jpg

banner5.jpg

516 ms

banner6.jpg

banner6.jpg

581 ms

banner7.jpg

banner7.jpg

604 ms

banner8.jpg

banner8.jpg

807 ms

banner9.jpg

banner9.jpg

807 ms

lab0.jpg

lab0.jpg

634 ms

lab1.jpg

lab1.jpg

626 ms

lab2.jpg

lab2.jpg

642 ms

lab3.jpg

lab3.jpg

804 ms

lab4.jpg

lab4.jpg

806 ms

lab5.jpg

lab5.jpg

804 ms

lab6.jpg

lab6.jpg

804 ms

lab7.jpg

lab7.jpg

806 ms

body-bg.jpg

body-bg.jpg

813 ms

new02.png

new02.png

814 ms

new01.png

new01.png

815 ms

new03.png

new03.png

818 ms

new04.png

new04.png

814 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

25 ms

xjElYSWRMWU

xjElYSWRMWU

82 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

67 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

90 ms

base.js

base.js

155 ms

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

37 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

38 ms

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

38 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

38 ms

main.8bc0b69923.css

main.8bc0b69923.css

71 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

44 ms

playerv5-embed.js.v5b530410decb4d5f9

playerv5-embed.js.v5b530410decb4d5f9

77 ms

dmp.aa8c53dee4b01d3bb05b.js

dmp.aa8c53dee4b01d3bb05b.js

85 ms

icons.png

icons.png

30 ms

1458421799843

1458421799843

370 ms

css

css

55 ms

56493d9dd1e6df032cef.dmp.js

56493d9dd1e6df032cef.dmp.js

90 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

15 ms

ajax-loader-3.gif

ajax-loader-3.gif

22 ms

Accessibility Review

htcare.us accessibility score

48

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

htcare.us best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

htcare.us SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Htcare.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Htcare.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

htcare.us

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Htcare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: