3.1 sec in total
583 ms
2.2 sec
272 ms
Visit hte.net now to see the best up-to-date Hte content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hte.net
MRT provides laser part marking, direct part marking, industrial vision cameras, machine vision inspection systems & barcode readers
Visit hte.netWe analyzed Hte.net page load time and found that the first response time was 583 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
hte.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value520 ms
56/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.9 s
34/100
10%
583 ms
97 ms
153 ms
150 ms
109 ms
Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Hte.net, 15% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (737 ms) relates to the external source Markreadtrack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 330.9 kB (18%)
1.8 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Hte.net main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 103.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 183.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hte needs image optimization as it can save up to 183.1 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 31.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 13.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hte.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (76%)
86
21
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hte. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.markreadtrack.com
583 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
97 ms
smls-frontend-style.css
153 ms
smls-block.css
150 ms
style.min.css
109 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
137 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
146 ms
vendors-style.css
178 ms
style.css
217 ms
styles.css
236 ms
font-awesome.min.css
280 ms
css
77 ms
css
77 ms
css
85 ms
css
84 ms
css
76 ms
css
79 ms
css
119 ms
css
89 ms
owl.carousel.css
226 ms
tooltipster.bundle.css
239 ms
smls-responsive.css
240 ms
popup-contact.css
291 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
324 ms
woocommerce.css
357 ms
style.css
320 ms
base.css
324 ms
layout.css
448 ms
shortcodes.css
397 ms
animations.min.css
445 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
500 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
413 ms
responsive.css
437 ms
css
83 ms
woocommerce.css
479 ms
jetpack.css
521 ms
jquery.min.js
505 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
544 ms
rbtools.min.js
584 ms
rs6.min.js
663 ms
owl.carousel.js
575 ms
tooltipster.bundle.js
580 ms
smls-frontend-script.js
676 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
611 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
661 ms
s-202408.js
60 ms
e-202408.js
60 ms
rs6.css
737 ms
woocommerce-add-to-cart.js
594 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
666 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
646 ms
index.js
663 ms
js.cookie.min.js
700 ms
woocommerce.min.js
630 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
626 ms
core.min.js
653 ms
mouse.min.js
640 ms
sortable.min.js
645 ms
tabs.min.js
657 ms
accordion.min.js
644 ms
plugins.js
715 ms
menu.js
606 ms
animations.min.js
659 ms
jplayer.min.js
662 ms
translate3d.js
634 ms
scripts.js
628 ms
comment-reply.min.js
612 ms
418133999
291 ms
New-Logo-1.png
440 ms
LS-Mark-Read-Track_50percent.jpg
482 ms
track-and-trace.png
388 ms
Engineered-solutions.png
388 ms
direct-part-marking.png
388 ms
Machine-Vision.png
438 ms
Barcode-readers.png
531 ms
TSM.jpg
459 ms
dana-e1588780510175.png
488 ms
MTD-e1588780623941.jpg
439 ms
kaiser-e1588780545557.png
482 ms
ABS.png
582 ms
canon.png
559 ms
parallexx.png
650 ms
ventilatorControl.png
660 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
36 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
50 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
45 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
48 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
46 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
45 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
43 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
46 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
48 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
70 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
71 ms
892771152-51bbce7e461778c6e8fcf0aac75020fb50f8bed665a5a240ed88a0c8b80e4479-d
222 ms
www.markreadtrack.com
381 ms
box_shadow.png
131 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
201 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf
4 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf
16 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf
17 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf
17 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf
17 ms
mfn-icons.woff
315 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
77 ms
hte.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hte.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
hte.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hte.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hte.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hte.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hte. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: