Tools & Wizards About Us
htmlstream.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

htmlstream.com

Free Bootstrap Templates and Themes by Htmlstream

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

29 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

489 ms

htmlstream.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Htmlstream content for Uzbekistan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about htmlstream.com

Forever Free, Open Source, Easy to Use Bootstrap Themes, Templates, UI Kits, Snippets and more crafted by Htmlstream.

Visit htmlstream.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Htmlstream.com page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

htmlstream.com performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,730 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.41

24/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.6 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

htmlstream.com

29 ms

htmlstream.com

90 ms

css

60 ms

toolkit.min.css

38 ms

chosen.css

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Htmlstream.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (851 ms) relates to the external source Mc.yandex.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (52%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Htmlstream.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 49.1 kB

  • Original 57.8 kB
  • After minification 45.0 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.7 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 309.1 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Htmlstream needs image optimization as it can save up to 309.1 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 233.6 kB

  • Original 397.9 kB
  • After minification 358.4 kB
  • After compression 164.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 233.6 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 960.3 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 141.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Htmlstream.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 960.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (53%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Htmlstream. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

htmlstream.com

htmlstream.com

29 ms

htmlstream.com

htmlstream.com

90 ms

css

css

60 ms

toolkit.min.css

toolkit.min.css

38 ms

chosen.css

chosen.css

30 ms

styles.hs.min.css

styles.hs.min.css

118 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

56 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

30 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

53 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

53 ms

hs.megamenu.js

hs.megamenu.js

54 ms

typed.min.js

typed.min.js

54 ms

custombox.min.js

custombox.min.js

55 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

56 ms

hs.core.js

hs.core.js

56 ms

hs.header.js

hs.header.js

56 ms

hs.hamburgers.js

hs.hamburgers.js

57 ms

hs.go-to.js

hs.go-to.js

57 ms

hs.text-slideshow.js

hs.text-slideshow.js

57 ms

hs.modal-window.js

hs.modal-window.js

58 ms

hs.dropdown.js

hs.dropdown.js

58 ms

hs.validation.js

hs.validation.js

59 ms

js

js

92 ms

logo-mini.png

logo-mini.png

58 ms

cc82a4038f9af5d05fd01f2da99d5e1d.png

cc82a4038f9af5d05fd01f2da99d5e1d.png

61 ms

eef3db2e34f69ec14a45ebcb685b49de.png

eef3db2e34f69ec14a45ebcb685b49de.png

80 ms

73664b6f8822b6efd86c765d4653b1b4.jpg

73664b6f8822b6efd86c765d4653b1b4.jpg

59 ms

64dadb3e06a51970387d122f74f5ba39.png

64dadb3e06a51970387d122f74f5ba39.png

78 ms

75813546a7d7bce03038df2133b86740.png

75813546a7d7bce03038df2133b86740.png

71 ms

b9194a9dde95a1ad63d5634a19ab9c30.png

b9194a9dde95a1ad63d5634a19ab9c30.png

67 ms

8474790cc2f24192b0184a543c0cc04e.jpg

8474790cc2f24192b0184a543c0cc04e.jpg

65 ms

coddrops.png

coddrops.png

72 ms

product-hunt.png

product-hunt.png

73 ms

webdesignerdepot.png

webdesignerdepot.png

78 ms

speckyboy.png

speckyboy.png

78 ms

hacker-news.png

hacker-news.png

79 ms

betalist.jpg

betalist.jpg

83 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

104 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

220 ms

tag.js

tag.js

851 ms

programming-logos.png

programming-logos.png

82 ms

programming-logos-colorful.png

programming-logos-colorful.png

81 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

108 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

162 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

163 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

14 ms

Simple-Line-Icons.ttf

Simple-Line-Icons.ttf

30 ms

hs-icons.ttf

hs-icons.ttf

14 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

20 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

62 ms

settings

settings

96 ms

Accessibility Review

htmlstream.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

htmlstream.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

htmlstream.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Htmlstream.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Htmlstream.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

htmlstream.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Htmlstream. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: