Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

hubb.me

Bocoran Slot Gacor Hari Ini! Anti Boncos! Link Daftar OVO88BET

Page Load Speed

7.1 sec in total

First Response

722 ms

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

388 ms

hubb.me screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Hubb content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hubb.me

Main slot gacor online di ovo88bet ! Kami menyediakan bocoran slot gacor terbaru dengan pola RTP dan jam hoki gampang menang. Sangat mudah maxwin hari ini!

Visit hubb.me

Key Findings

We analyzed Hubb.me page load time and found that the first response time was 722 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hubb.me performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value920 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hubb.me

722 ms

www.hubb.me

1989 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

437 ms

styles.css

184 ms

style.css

141 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Hubb.me, 9% (7 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Hubb.me.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (52%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Hubb.me main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 158.0 kB

  • Original 196.3 kB
  • After minification 192.7 kB
  • After compression 38.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 158.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 44.6 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hubb images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 569.0 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 704.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 569.0 kB or 45% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 152.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hubb.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (74%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hubb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

hubb.me accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

hubb.me best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

hubb.me SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hubb.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hubb.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hubb. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: