Tools & Wizards About Us
huddlestonsmith.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

huddlestonsmith.com

Huddleston Smith Wealth Management

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

356 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

356 ms

huddlestonsmith.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Huddleston Smith content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about huddlestonsmith.com

Wealth Management Services

Visit huddlestonsmith.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Huddlestonsmith.com page load time and found that the first response time was 356 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

huddlestonsmith.com performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value34.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.4 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,900 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.843

4/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.huddlestonsmith.com

356 ms

gtmAdvisorSites.js

103 ms

modals.css

186 ms

~TQ1.css

263 ms

modular.css

199 ms

Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Huddlestonsmith.com, 29% (29 requests) were made to Google.com and 13% (13 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Huddlestonsmith.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 511.5 kB (53%)

Content Size

956.1 kB

After Optimization

444.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Huddlestonsmith.com main page is 956.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 847.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 27.3 kB

  • Original 35.7 kB
  • After minification 32.2 kB
  • After compression 8.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 515 B

  • Original 22.9 kB
  • After minification 22.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Huddleston Smith images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 444.2 kB

  • Original 847.1 kB
  • After minification 824.5 kB
  • After compression 402.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 444.2 kB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 39.4 kB

  • Original 50.5 kB
  • After minification 48.8 kB
  • After compression 11.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Huddlestonsmith.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (57%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

37

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Huddleston Smith. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.huddlestonsmith.com

www.huddlestonsmith.com

356 ms

gtmAdvisorSites.js

gtmAdvisorSites.js

103 ms

modals.css

modals.css

186 ms

~TQ1.css

~TQ1.css

263 ms

modular.css

modular.css

199 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

197 ms

awp.js

awp.js

40 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

278 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.4.min.js

jquery-ui-1.10.4.min.js

326 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

14 ms

siteAlert.js

siteAlert.js

260 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

278 ms

jwplayer.js

jwplayer.js

380 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

344 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

380 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

402 ms

scrollreveal.min.js

scrollreveal.min.js

402 ms

skrollr.min.js

skrollr.min.js

423 ms

global.js

global.js

425 ms

modals.js

modals.js

441 ms

keys.js

keys.js

443 ms

slickNavLaunch.js

slickNavLaunch.js

439 ms

onclicknavigation.js

onclicknavigation.js

441 ms

default.js

default.js

465 ms

css

css

28 ms

brokerCheck.js

brokerCheck.js

476 ms

awp.js

awp.js

104 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

24 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

32 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

141 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

43 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

9 ms

479379365738123

479379365738123

39 ms

71 ms

58 ms

js

js

39 ms

22 ms

css

css

20 ms

42 ms

36 ms

insight.old.min.js

insight.old.min.js

15 ms

Building%203.png

Building%203.png

3037 ms

maps

maps

61 ms

424319248117121

424319248117121

41 ms

proximanova-reg-webfont.woff

proximanova-reg-webfont.woff

161 ms

proximanova-light-webfont.woff

proximanova-light-webfont.woff

300 ms

70ae52ec-d89b-4c6a-9402-854ebe423c54.woff

70ae52ec-d89b-4c6a-9402-854ebe423c54.woff

121 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

360 ms

292386831988893

292386831988893

7 ms

embed

embed

379 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

22 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

78 ms

12 ms

js

js

15 ms

init_embed.js

init_embed.js

18 ms

common.js

common.js

32 ms

util.js

util.js

46 ms

map.js

map.js

44 ms

google4.png

google4.png

19 ms

overlay.js

overlay.js

17 ms

onion.js

onion.js

14 ms

search_impl.js

search_impl.js

14 ms

openhand_8_8.cur

openhand_8_8.cur

65 ms

kh

kh

20 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

44 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

16 ms

vt

vt

165 ms

vt

vt

113 ms

vt

vt

112 ms

vt

vt

119 ms

vt

vt

123 ms

vt

vt

122 ms

vt

vt

155 ms

vt

vt

148 ms

vt

vt

149 ms

vt

vt

153 ms

vt

vt

154 ms

vt

vt

189 ms

vt

vt

202 ms

vt

vt

185 ms

vt

vt

201 ms

vt

vt

184 ms

vt

vt

179 ms

vt

vt

210 ms

vt

vt

213 ms

vt

vt

212 ms

vt

vt

215 ms

vt

vt

238 ms

vt

vt

237 ms

vt

vt

245 ms

vt

vt

245 ms

vt

vt

242 ms

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

12 ms

QuotaService.RecordEvent

QuotaService.RecordEvent

14 ms

controls.js

controls.js

3 ms

QuotaService.RecordEvent

QuotaService.RecordEvent

36 ms

css

css

18 ms

entity11.png

entity11.png

36 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

7 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

10 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

15 ms

Accessibility Review

huddlestonsmith.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Best Practices

huddlestonsmith.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

huddlestonsmith.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Huddlestonsmith.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Huddlestonsmith.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

huddlestonsmith.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Huddleston Smith. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: