Tools & Wizards About Us
hum-on.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

hum-on.com

Top 10 Best Songwriting Software Free for Musicians 2021 - TechVibe

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

66 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

711 ms

hum-on.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Hum On content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hum-on.com

Top 10 Best Songwriting Software Free for Musicians 2021, This article is especially for the best songwriting software free It's difficult to write tunes. Sometimes you don't know where to b...

Visit hum-on.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Hum-on.com page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hum-on.com performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

49/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hum-on.com

66 ms

34 ms

336 ms

7c1a4f48a86173f0366cbdd9a50ee985.css

29 ms

jquery.min-3.7.1.js

226 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Hum-on.com, 45% (10 requests) were made to Techvibeblog.org and 45% (10 requests) were made to Blog.landr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (776 ms) relates to the external source Techvibeblog.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 112.2 kB (16%)

Content Size

688.7 kB

After Optimization

576.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hum-on.com main page is 688.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 596.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 73.9 kB

  • Original 90.2 kB
  • After minification 90.1 kB
  • After compression 16.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 38.3 kB

  • Original 596.5 kB
  • After minification 558.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hum On images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hum On. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

hum-on.com

hum-on.com

66 ms

34 ms

336 ms

7c1a4f48a86173f0366cbdd9a50ee985.css

7c1a4f48a86173f0366cbdd9a50ee985.css

29 ms

jquery.min-3.7.1.js

jquery.min-3.7.1.js

226 ms

38ac4060b09fed443c876dcf05a974ca.js

38ac4060b09fed443c876dcf05a974ca.js

18 ms

songwritingtools_1-autochords.jpg

songwritingtools_1-autochords.jpg

174 ms

songwritingtools_2-The-Method-Behind-The-Music.jpg

songwritingtools_2-The-Method-Behind-The-Music.jpg

145 ms

songwritingtools_3-LandrCollaboration.jpg

songwritingtools_3-LandrCollaboration.jpg

167 ms

songwritingtools_4-Rhymezone.jpg

songwritingtools_4-Rhymezone.jpg

170 ms

songwritingtools_5-HookTheoryTrends.jpg

songwritingtools_5-HookTheoryTrends.jpg

169 ms

songwritingtools_6-humon.jpg

songwritingtools_6-humon.jpg

169 ms

songwritingtools_7-io-808.jpg

songwritingtools_7-io-808.jpg

167 ms

songwritingtools_8-bandlab.jpg

songwritingtools_8-bandlab.jpg

168 ms

songwritingtools_9-Audiotool.jpg

songwritingtools_9-Audiotool.jpg

168 ms

songwritingtools_10-chordbot.jpg

songwritingtools_10-chordbot.jpg

168 ms

TechVibe-Blog.png

TechVibe-Blog.png

68 ms

preloader.gif

preloader.gif

68 ms

songwriting--750x563.png

songwriting--750x563.png

776 ms

jeg-empty.png

jeg-empty.png

93 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

531 ms

jegicon.woff

jegicon.woff

26 ms

Accessibility Review

hum-on.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

hum-on.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

hum-on.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hum-on.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hum-on.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hum-on.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hum On. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: