Tools & Wizards About Us
humanetics.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

humanetics.com

Humanetics Precision Metal Works making metal parts that exceed your expectations

Page Load Speed

16.3 sec in total

First Response

4.6 sec

Resources Loaded

11.6 sec

Page Rendered

119 ms

humanetics.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to humanetics.com homepage info - get ready to check Humanetics best content right away, or after learning these important things about humanetics.com

Is it precise enough? That’s the question Humanetics has asked for over fifty years. The result? Metal parts expertly fashioned from your designs.

Visit humanetics.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Humanetics.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.6 sec and then it took 11.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

humanetics.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.161

73/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

4571 ms

bootstrap.css

133 ms

InfiniteH.css

205 ms

jquery.min.js

23 ms

js

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Humanetics.com, 6% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Humanetics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 499.4 kB (67%)

Content Size

740.2 kB

After Optimization

240.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Humanetics.com main page is 740.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 552.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 10.0 kB
  • After minification 8.1 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.9 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 457.3 kB

  • Original 552.3 kB
  • After minification 95.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Humanetics needs image optimization as it can save up to 457.3 kB or 83% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 25.0 kB

  • Original 147.5 kB
  • After minification 147.5 kB
  • After compression 122.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.0 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 9.5 kB

  • Original 30.4 kB
  • After minification 30.4 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Humanetics.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (20%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Humanetics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

4571 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

133 ms

InfiniteH.css

InfiniteH.css

205 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

23 ms

js

js

55 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

587 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

679 ms

InfiniteHblueHZ.svg

InfiniteHblueHZ.svg

571 ms

Landhero26.png

Landhero26.png

4640 ms

Land1.png

Land1.png

950 ms

Land2.png

Land2.png

1199 ms

Land3.png

Land3.png

1361 ms

Land4.png

Land4.png

1021 ms

Land5.png

Land5.png

1091 ms

Land6.png

Land6.png

1219 ms

Sociallineup.png

Sociallineup.png

1273 ms

Accessibility Review

humanetics.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

humanetics.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

humanetics.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Humanetics.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Humanetics.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

humanetics.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Humanetics. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: