Tools & Wizards About Us
hyperping.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

hyperping.io

Hyperping | Uptime monitoring with public status pages

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

21 ms

Resources Loaded

455 ms

Page Rendered

924 ms

hyperping.io screenshot

About Website

Welcome to hyperping.io homepage info - get ready to check Hyperping best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about hyperping.io

Uptime monitoring for websites and APIs, public status pages, instantly receive alerts by emails, Slack and SMS

Visit hyperping.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Hyperping.io page load time and found that the first response time was 21 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hyperping.io performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value510 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.8 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hyperping.io

21 ms

hyperping.com

108 ms

css2

38 ms

css2

56 ms

css2

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Hyperping.io, 66% (25 requests) were made to Hyperping.com and 16% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (141 ms) relates to the external source Hyperping.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 763.1 kB (24%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Hyperping.io main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 278.8 kB

  • Original 440.1 kB
  • After minification 439.9 kB
  • After compression 161.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 278.8 kB or 63% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 484.3 kB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hyperping needs image optimization as it can save up to 484.3 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 65 B

  • Original 21.8 kB
  • After minification 21.8 kB
  • After compression 21.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (31%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hyperping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

hyperping.io

hyperping.io

21 ms

hyperping.com

hyperping.com

108 ms

css2

css2

38 ms

css2

css2

56 ms

css2

css2

59 ms

css2

css2

61 ms

css2

css2

62 ms

css2

css2

63 ms

plausible.js

plausible.js

27 ms

badge.js

badge.js

11 ms

webpack-runtime-d93a718b0a8e14126270.js

webpack-runtime-d93a718b0a8e14126270.js

12 ms

framework-fb757f436fc6fd051a3f.js

framework-fb757f436fc6fd051a3f.js

34 ms

app-167044961f85f1c09159.js

app-167044961f85f1c09159.js

20 ms

republiquefrancaise-3d87683e3d28cecea0bda742aa1df7ac.svg

republiquefrancaise-3d87683e3d28cecea0bda742aa1df7ac.svg

44 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

41 ms

ipinfo-eda9b0fa9bdce393cc9fdc41f3337e29.svg

ipinfo-eda9b0fa9bdce393cc9fdc41f3337e29.svg

31 ms

docstation-cfa828b0cbf49ac7b9552d1462009853.svg

docstation-cfa828b0cbf49ac7b9552d1462009853.svg

31 ms

jarratt-854fd4f9890ad18b51d6edcc3f2f48c1.jpeg

jarratt-854fd4f9890ad18b51d6edcc3f2f48c1.jpeg

32 ms

uptimechart-911771d699abe7b21436cf372694c5d7.png

uptimechart-911771d699abe7b21436cf372694c5d7.png

34 ms

pierre-c83a9d65ffb44be6ffc88f447dfe00ad.jpg

pierre-c83a9d65ffb44be6ffc88f447dfe00ad.jpg

135 ms

telegram-background-70fba9fd24e3e515d5b103622b2415ea.jpeg

telegram-background-70fba9fd24e3e515d5b103622b2415ea.jpeg

136 ms

telegram-9b3668708410c45831f0979d09a8c7db.png

telegram-9b3668708410c45831f0979d09a8c7db.png

37 ms

helpdocs-background-798b8a2c48c37c885de1987508d881f2.png

helpdocs-background-798b8a2c48c37c885de1987508d881f2.png

141 ms

slack-background-c475c379c442064d45fe8e08381230fc.jpg

slack-background-c475c379c442064d45fe8e08381230fc.jpg

135 ms

twilio-background-827cf8c553ab03aded829050c1488895.png

twilio-background-827cf8c553ab03aded829050c1488895.png

136 ms

teams-8c4ab7cd1b791524753a4ca35704c144.png

teams-8c4ab7cd1b791524753a4ca35704c144.png

137 ms

pagerduty-background-c2a4d71188aef2b9862e98a4194588a5.png

pagerduty-background-c2a4d71188aef2b9862e98a4194588a5.png

135 ms

opsgenie-background-00e327509339b7d5a50318f9ff2d13b3.webp

opsgenie-background-00e327509339b7d5a50318f9ff2d13b3.webp

138 ms

google-background-9527b4df1d6227a1f54b55e1d5682996.png

google-background-9527b4df1d6227a1f54b55e1d5682996.png

137 ms

jakob-e13a67aabc54067a218b8bdd81699bc7.png

jakob-e13a67aabc54067a218b8bdd81699bc7.png

139 ms

jarratt-854fd4f9890ad18b51d6edcc3f2f48c1.jpg

jarratt-854fd4f9890ad18b51d6edcc3f2f48c1.jpg

139 ms

marijn-e4186f3007d0318a397cd53831e00a92.jpeg

marijn-e4186f3007d0318a397cd53831e00a92.jpeg

137 ms

moritz-8f51734492cae95d059273920d141d66.jpeg

moritz-8f51734492cae95d059273920d141d66.jpeg

138 ms

gaspar-34ad75cbc54ca9087eed8cb918e26059.jpeg

gaspar-34ad75cbc54ca9087eed8cb918e26059.jpeg

137 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf

26 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf

59 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf

86 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf

86 ms

Accessibility Review

hyperping.io accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

hyperping.io best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

hyperping.io SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hyperping.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hyperping.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hyperping.io

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hyperping. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: