8.8 sec in total
1.1 sec
6.9 sec
858 ms
Welcome to m.hanagal.com homepage info - get ready to check M Hanagal best content right away, or after learning these important things about m.hanagal.com
hanagal
Visit m.hanagal.comWe analyzed M.hanagal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
m.hanagal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.2 s
0/100
10%
Value21.8 s
0/100
25%
Value17.4 s
0/100
10%
Value950 ms
29/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value21.2 s
1/100
10%
1105 ms
1543 ms
1051 ms
582 ms
663 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original M.hanagal.com, 28% (23 requests) were made to 2.ss.faisys.com and 20% (17 requests) were made to 24865223.s21i.faiusr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Hanagal.com.
Page size can be reduced by 901.4 kB (18%)
5.1 MB
4.2 MB
In fact, the total size of M.hanagal.com main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 132.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 132.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 768.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, M Hanagal needs image optimization as it can save up to 768.9 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 25 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 163 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. M.hanagal.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (50%)
72
36
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of M Hanagal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
m.hanagal.com
1105 ms
www.hanagal.com
1543 ms
outerChain.jsp
1051 ms
siteBase2.min.css
582 ms
base2.min.css
663 ms
module.min.css
648 ms
fkTheme.min.css
442 ms
themeMixin.min.css
644 ms
moduleAnimation.min.css
648 ms
fkNav.min.css
478 ms
newSearchBoxStyle.min.css
652 ms
jzcusstyle.jsp
647 ms
vue-2.7.14.min.js
444 ms
comMethods.min.js
479 ms
jzUtils.min.js
509 ms
polyfill.min.js
530 ms
jzRequest.min.js
626 ms
jzUtils.min.js
680 ms
bizShared.min.js
708 ms
bizShared.min.css
690 ms
jquery-core.min.js
517 ms
jquery-mousewheel.min.js
515 ms
frontend.min.js
515 ms
jquery-ui-core.min.js
541 ms
partitionSite.min.js
650 ms
1033.min.js
691 ms
site.min.js
585 ms
module.min.js
578 ms
city2.min.js
548 ms
fontsIco.min.css
647 ms
hawkEye.min.js
335 ms
ABUIABAEGAAg7Ma9_gUolJGjFjCkETimCQ.png
431 ms
vbg01.png
84 ms
dot.gif
425 ms
yellow_left.png
42 ms
yellow_middle.png
43 ms
yellow_right.png
42 ms
sound_0_on.gif
43 ms
ABUIABAEGAAgkcWU_QUo3YeAUDDfATgt!160x160.png
404 ms
ABUIABAEGAAgy8aU_QUo0JSzvQUwlwE4Pg!100x100.png
418 ms
ABUIABACGAAgnvzkpwYoot7mjAEwgA842AQ.jpg
540 ms
video-js.min.css
36 ms
video.min.css
35 ms
datepicker.min.css
38 ms
icomoon.ttf
350 ms
icomoon.ttf
352 ms
icomoon.ttf
350 ms
icomoon.ttf
351 ms
ABUIx9PtCxBMGAAg_-7gpwYokP2qkAc
375 ms
ABUIx9PtCxBMGAAggf7gpwYo3N2K3wc
375 ms
ABUIx9PtCxBMGAAggf7gpwYogMT5ygI
376 ms
ABUIx9PtCxBMGAAg_-7gpwYo8JjjUg
435 ms
video.min.js
347 ms
photoSlide.min.js
346 ms
imageEffect.min.js
346 ms
ajaxLoadModuleDom_h.jsp
1032 ms
site_h.jsp
287 ms
log_h.jsp
839 ms
site_h.jsp
841 ms
log_h.jsp
841 ms
login_h.jsp
357 ms
bannerAnimation.min.css
75 ms
vbg01.png
82 ms
vbg01.png
143 ms
01.png
55 ms
setCookie_h.jsp
478 ms
siteDomain_h.jsp
925 ms
module_h.jsp
1045 ms
ABUIABACGAAg8rHgpwYogKKt0QQw0A840AU.jpg
449 ms
ABUIABACGAAgiPLkpwYo7NKOOzCADzjYBA.jpg
1138 ms
ABUIABACGAAgiPLkpwYo6uqxrAcwgA842AQ.jpg
927 ms
AI4BCMfT7QsQAhgAIKKr6-oFKLi9mfgBMIAKONAF.jpg
374 ms
mbg01.png
366 ms
push.js
771 ms
log_h.jsp
521 ms
I5YL3XhodRRsVWZe4NnZOhWnSAWgxhMoEr6SmzZieF43Mk7ZOBdeCVGrp9Eu+54J2xhySplfB5XHwQLXUmT9KH6+kPnQ7ZYuIEzNyfs1DLU1VU4SWZ6LkXGHsD1ZKbMw=
14 ms
ABUIABACGAAg5djkpwYojJCxvwYwpQI4rgM.jpg
403 ms
ABUIABAEGAAgs8DB_gUo0vW18wEwsAk4sAk!160x160.png
871 ms
ABUIABACGAAgzZPhpwYosfy4ZzClAjiuAw.jpg
192 ms
ABUIABAEGAAgs8DB_gUo0vW18wEwsAk4sAk!200x200.png
292 ms
ABUIABACGAAg5djkpwYos4aO-wQwpQI4rgM.jpg
434 ms
ABUIABACGAAgtvHkpwYoqOOswQUwpQI4rgM.jpg
758 ms
svg.min.js
34 ms
m.hanagal.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
m.hanagal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
m.hanagal.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise M.hanagal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that M.hanagal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
m.hanagal.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of M Hanagal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: