9.1 sec in total
2.2 sec
6.6 sec
370 ms
Visit webmail.heckgrammar.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Webmail Heck Grammar content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webmail.heckgrammar.co.uk
Visit webmail.heckgrammar.co.ukWe analyzed Webmail.heckgrammar.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
webmail.heckgrammar.co.uk performance score
2201 ms
175 ms
649 ms
176 ms
175 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Webmail.heckgrammar.co.uk, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Heckgrammar.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (54%)
2.3 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Webmail.heckgrammar.co.uk main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 977.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 238.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webmail Heck Grammar needs image optimization as it can save up to 238.7 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 603.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 603.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 399.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webmail.heckgrammar.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 399.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (56%)
63
28
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webmail Heck Grammar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
2201 ms
ccm.base.css
175 ms
jquery.js
649 ms
ccm.base.js
176 ms
typography.css
175 ms
bootstrap.css
730 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
601 ms
docs.css
622 ms
prettify.css
281 ms
bootstrap-overwrites.css
790 ms
modernizr.js
642 ms
prettify.js
865 ms
bootstrap.min.js
973 ms
view.css
741 ms
view.css
822 ms
jquery.ui.css
1078 ms
css
23 ms
ccm.app.css
1595 ms
fullcalendar.css
1158 ms
jquery.qtip.min.css
1163 ms
dcmegamenu.css
1117 ms
jquery.KeyTips.js
1312 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
1248 ms
jquery.dcmegamenu.1.3.3.js
1476 ms
customcss
1515 ms
jquery.ui.js
2074 ms
css
32 ms
view.css
1427 ms
jquery.cookiesdirective.js
1734 ms
app.js
1457 ms
bootstrap.js
1489 ms
ccm.app.js
2053 ms
tiny_mce.js
2200 ms
fullcalendar.min.js
1965 ms
gcal.js
1662 ms
jquery.qtip.min.js
2160 ms
bootstrap-transition.js
1905 ms
bootstrap-carousel.js
2100 ms
bg-footer.png
2173 ms
hgs-badge.png
890 ms
ofsted-outstanding.png
890 ms
BANNER-home1.jpg
902 ms
BANNER-home3.jpg
955 ms
BANNER-writing.jpg
893 ms
Banner_Sax_1.jpg
922 ms
Banner_Lib_Sixth.jpg
1251 ms
Banner_Blossom_Schoolname.jpg
1377 ms
Banner_Football.jpg
1466 ms
Banner_DT.jpg
1490 ms
459ca1eebdb61a05dd4f4645d178e5a6_f1880.png
1175 ms
72c736a291afc8efe0b8ba26052a336a_f1840.jpg
1135 ms
rss.png
1308 ms
accreditation_logos_2016.fw.png
2130 ms
parentpay.gif
1410 ms
ef_logo_sml.png
1474 ms
schooldirect.gif
1629 ms
thinkuknow.gif
1662 ms
ceopreportbtn.gif
1958 ms
bg-footergrad.png
1644 ms
hgs-medium-webfont.woff
1897 ms
hgs-book-webfont.woff
2074 ms
hgs-light-webfont.woff
2036 ms
hgs-bold-webfont.woff
2061 ms
arrow.png
1211 ms
arrow_off.png
1281 ms
throbber_white_32.gif
1385 ms
webmail.heckgrammar.co.uk SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmail.heckgrammar.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Webmail.heckgrammar.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webmail.heckgrammar.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webmail Heck Grammar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: