Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 48

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

Page Load Speed

581 ms in total

First Response

132 ms

Resources Loaded

363 ms

Page Rendered

86 ms

demo2.interactivetools.com screenshot

About Website

Visit demo2.interactivetools.com now to see the best up-to-date Demo 2 Interactivetools content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about demo2.interactivetools.com

Visit demo2.interactivetools.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Demo2.interactivetools.com page load time and found that the first response time was 132 ms and then it took 449 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

demo2.interactivetools.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

demo2.interactivetools.com

132 ms

website.css

44 ms

logo_cmsb.png

160 ms

header_logo.gif

44 ms

spacer.gif

87 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Demo2.interactivetools.com, 14% (1 request) were made to Interactivetools.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (160 ms) relates to the external source Interactivetools.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 12.6 kB (59%)

Content Size

21.5 kB

After Optimization

8.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Demo2.interactivetools.com main page is 21.5 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 8.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 6.6 kB
  • After minification 6.1 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.7 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 818 B

  • Original 6.5 kB
  • After minification 5.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Demo 2 Interactivetools needs image optimization as it can save up to 818 B or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 8.4 kB
  • After minification 5.9 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Demo2.interactivetools.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Demo 2 Interactivetools. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

demo2.interactivetools.com accessibility score

48

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

demo2.interactivetools.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

demo2.interactivetools.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Demo2.interactivetools.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Demo2.interactivetools.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Demo 2 Interactivetools. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: