Tools & Wizards About Us
i-l-m.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

i-l-m.com

ILM

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

334 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

144 ms

i-l-m.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to i-l-m.com homepage info - get ready to check ILM best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about i-l-m.com

ILM creates leaders and develops managers through qualifications, training and cutting edge research. Find out how to work or learn with ILM today.

Visit i-l-m.com

Key Findings

We analyzed I-l-m.com page load time and found that the first response time was 334 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

i-l-m.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,020 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

i-l-m.com

334 ms

www.i-l-m.com

698 ms

modernizr-2.5.3.min.js

201 ms

jquery.1.10.2.min.js

478 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.min.js

598 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original I-l-m.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (785 ms) relates to the external source Uk1.siteimprove.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (64%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

688.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of I-l-m.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 950.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 51.9 kB

  • Original 65.9 kB
  • After minification 54.9 kB
  • After compression 14.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.0 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 129.9 kB

  • Original 464.1 kB
  • After minification 334.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, ILM needs image optimization as it can save up to 129.9 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 678.3 kB

  • Original 950.5 kB
  • After minification 848.3 kB
  • After compression 272.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 678.3 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 387.5 kB

  • Original 455.5 kB
  • After minification 417.4 kB
  • After compression 68.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. I-l-m.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 387.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (53%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ILM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

i-l-m.com

i-l-m.com

334 ms

www.i-l-m.com

www.i-l-m.com

698 ms

modernizr-2.5.3.min.js

modernizr-2.5.3.min.js

201 ms

jquery.1.10.2.min.js

jquery.1.10.2.min.js

478 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.min.js

jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.min.js

598 ms

jquery.roundabout.js

jquery.roundabout.js

325 ms

jquery.roundabout-shapes.js

jquery.roundabout-shapes.js

246 ms

js

js

171 ms

style.css

style.css

493 ms

VisitorIdentification.aspx

VisitorIdentification.aspx

327 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

405 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

424 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

426 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

494 ms

jquery.tinyscrollbar.min.js

jquery.tinyscrollbar.min.js

434 ms

script.js

script.js

566 ms

html5shiv-printshiv.js

html5shiv-printshiv.js

480 ms

cookie-check.js

cookie-check.js

479 ms

ilm-insight-carousel.js

ilm-insight-carousel.js

507 ms

ga_dpc_youtube.js

ga_dpc_youtube.js

564 ms

_dmpt.js

_dmpt.js

564 ms

css

css

58 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

493 ms

logo.png

logo.png

487 ms

Green_King_Coaching%20png.ashx

Green_King_Coaching%20png.ashx

512 ms

deeside235x180px%20jpg.ashx

deeside235x180px%20jpg.ashx

489 ms

Babcock_Apprentice%20png.ashx

Babcock_Apprentice%20png.ashx

511 ms

Fred-Allson-acredited-learner%20png.ashx

Fred-Allson-acredited-learner%20png.ashx

512 ms

mcinnes235x180px%20jpg.ashx

mcinnes235x180px%20jpg.ashx

488 ms

background.jpg

background.jpg

737 ms

267.gif

267.gif

511 ms

9Mar_Apprenticeships_INSWidget%20png.ashx

9Mar_Apprenticeships_INSWidget%20png.ashx

510 ms

candg53x55%20png.ashx

candg53x55%20png.ashx

604 ms

white-pixel-80.png

white-pixel-80.png

582 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

489 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

506 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

517 ms

myprofile-sprite.png

myprofile-sprite.png

569 ms

myprofile-icon.png

myprofile-icon.png

567 ms

dropdowns.png

dropdowns.png

581 ms

secondary-nav-icon.png

secondary-nav-icon.png

630 ms

3d-rectangle.png

3d-rectangle.png

631 ms

magnify.png

magnify.png

631 ms

nav-sprite.png

nav-sprite.png

641 ms

pixel60.png

pixel60.png

669 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

518 ms

comments-icon-white.png

comments-icon-white.png

696 ms

site-footer.png

site-footer.png

682 ms

siteanalyze_83096.js

siteanalyze_83096.js

785 ms

header-dropdown.png

header-dropdown.png

276 ms

widget-dropdown.png

widget-dropdown.png

291 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

56 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

72 ms

noAR67e_LPY

noAR67e_LPY

97 ms

collect

collect

28 ms

timeline.1b43d11859b7663a2225b885f87704a5.js

timeline.1b43d11859b7663a2225b885f87704a5.js

36 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

62 ms

www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css

www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css

77 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

106 ms

base.js

base.js

176 ms

syndication

syndication

111 ms

288613948889112576

288613948889112576

279 ms

6BOEML_YqI6cKINK5dmh8ZufcXg7sBa4jeB-I9gQ0xI.js

6BOEML_YqI6cKINK5dmh8ZufcXg7sBa4jeB-I9gQ0xI.js

27 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

69 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

48 ms

image.aspx

image.aspx

91 ms

timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css

timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css

28 ms

timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css

timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css

70 ms

Accessibility Review

i-l-m.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

i-l-m.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

i-l-m.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise I-l-m.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that I-l-m.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

i-l-m.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ILM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: