Tools & Wizards About Us
ibstec.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

ibstec.com

Home - IBSTec

Page Load Speed

7.2 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

126 ms

ibstec.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ibstec.com homepage info - get ready to check IBSTec best content for Pakistan right away, or after learning these important things about ibstec.com

WEB & SOFTWARE Web development | Desktop applications | Mobile Applications IT & CLOUD IT Support | Networking Solutions | Hosting Solutions | Cloud | Security Solutions TELEPHONY Data Connectivity | ...

Visit ibstec.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ibstec.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ibstec.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.279

43/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.4 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ibstec.com

1640 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

448 ms

post-2109.css

313 ms

main.min.css

495 ms

css

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Ibstec.com, 15% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Ibstec.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (75%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

416.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ibstec.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 910.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 116.0 kB

  • Original 139.5 kB
  • After minification 136.8 kB
  • After compression 23.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 15.0 kB

  • Original 147.2 kB
  • After minification 132.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IBSTec images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 325.7 kB

  • Original 469.2 kB
  • After minification 461.9 kB
  • After compression 143.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 325.7 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 792.9 kB

  • Original 910.3 kB
  • After minification 908.1 kB
  • After compression 117.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ibstec.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 792.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (78%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IBSTec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ibstec.com

ibstec.com

1640 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

448 ms

post-2109.css

post-2109.css

313 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

495 ms

css

css

33 ms

menu-animation.min.css

menu-animation.min.css

226 ms

ekiticons.css

ekiticons.css

660 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

357 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

436 ms

post-1399.css

post-1399.css

334 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

664 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

487 ms

she-header-style.css

she-header-style.css

465 ms

post-2683.css

post-2683.css

516 ms

widget-styles.css

widget-styles.css

1159 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

639 ms

css

css

28 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

653 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

647 ms

she-header.js

she-header.js

790 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

792 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

799 ms

frontend-script.js

frontend-script.js

761 ms

widget-scripts.js

widget-scripts.js

1010 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

869 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1001 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

919 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

922 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1007 ms

animate-circle.min.js

animate-circle.min.js

1031 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

1046 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1117 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

1114 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1118 ms

logo1-140x155.png

logo1-140x155.png

182 ms

placeholder-661-1.png

placeholder-661-1.png

152 ms

Banner-2-1536x538.jpg

Banner-2-1536x538.jpg

333 ms

Flaticon_33592-1.png

Flaticon_33592-1.png

149 ms

Flaticon_180031.png

Flaticon_180031.png

150 ms

tele.png

tele.png

148 ms

Flaticon_13802.png

Flaticon_13802.png

216 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

78 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

99 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

109 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

111 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

112 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

111 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

110 ms

elementskit.woff

elementskit.woff

415 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

109 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

180 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

191 ms

Accessibility Review

ibstec.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ibstec.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ibstec.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ibstec.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ibstec.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ibstec.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IBSTec. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: