Tools & Wizards About Us
icedq.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

icedq.com

DataOps Platform | ETL Testing and Monitoring | iCEDQ

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

108 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

266 ms

icedq.com screenshot

About Website

Visit icedq.com now to see the best up-to-date ICEDQ content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about icedq.com

Automate ETL testing, data quality and monitoring for implementing DataOps across your organization using iCEDQ.

Visit icedq.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Icedq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

icedq.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value630 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.133

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

icedq.com

108 ms

icedq.com

457 ms

jquery.min.js

50 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

57 ms

DOMPurify.min.js

62 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Icedq.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Static.cloudflareinsights.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (457 ms) belongs to the original domain Icedq.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 472.1 kB (49%)

Content Size

961.3 kB

After Optimization

489.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Icedq.com main page is 961.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 565.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 469.7 kB

  • Original 565.4 kB
  • After minification 565.1 kB
  • After compression 95.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 469.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 395.2 kB
  • After minification 392.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ICEDQ images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (65%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

28

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ICEDQ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

icedq.com

icedq.com

108 ms

icedq.com

icedq.com

457 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

50 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

57 ms

DOMPurify.min.js

DOMPurify.min.js

62 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

81 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

67 ms

front.js

front.js

63 ms

front.js

front.js

69 ms

jq-sticky-anything.min.js

jq-sticky-anything.min.js

72 ms

svgs-inline-min.js

svgs-inline-min.js

74 ms

livevalidation_standalone.js

livevalidation_standalone.js

79 ms

public.js

public.js

80 ms

default_validation.js

default_validation.js

81 ms

above-the-fold.min.js

above-the-fold.min.js

84 ms

modernizr-custom.min.js

modernizr-custom.min.js

83 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

98 ms

ultimate.min.js

ultimate.min.js

100 ms

ultimate_bg.min.js

ultimate_bg.min.js

98 ms

modal-all.min.js

modal-all.min.js

98 ms

ytprefs.min.js

ytprefs.min.js

99 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

58 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

74 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

73 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

73 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

77 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

81 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

87 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

85 ms

page-scroll-to-id.min.js

page-scroll-to-id.min.js

86 ms

stickThis.js

stickThis.js

84 ms

wpmssab.min.js

wpmssab.min.js

155 ms

SmoothScroll.min.js

SmoothScroll.min.js

156 ms

wpmss.min.js

wpmss.min.js

158 ms

legacy.min.js

legacy.min.js

157 ms

jquery-mousewheel.min.js

jquery-mousewheel.min.js

159 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

154 ms

custom-scrollbar.min.js

custom-scrollbar.min.js

155 ms

SmoothScroll.min.js

SmoothScroll.min.js

149 ms

fitvids.min.js

fitvids.min.js

143 ms

ivory-search.min.js

ivory-search.min.js

136 ms

complianz.min.js

complianz.min.js

137 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

135 ms

images-continuous-thumbnail-slider-plus-lightbox-jc.js

images-continuous-thumbnail-slider-plus-lightbox-jc.js

139 ms

continuous-l-box-js.js

continuous-l-box-js.js

132 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

130 ms

iceDQ-New-Logo.png

iceDQ-New-Logo.png

128 ms

the7-chevron-down.svg

the7-chevron-down.svg

123 ms

the7-chevron-side.svg

the7-chevron-side.svg

134 ms

iceDQ-Client.png

iceDQ-Client.png

122 ms

DataOps-Platform-for-Testing-and-Monitoring-iceDQ.webp

DataOps-Platform-for-Testing-and-Monitoring-iceDQ.webp

122 ms

Snowflake-250x50.png

Snowflake-250x50.png

131 ms

iCEDQ-partner-Yellowbrick-250x50.png

iCEDQ-partner-Yellowbrick-250x50.png

131 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

296 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

400 ms

icomoon-the7-font.ttf

icomoon-the7-font.ttf

86 ms

Defaults.woff

Defaults.woff

276 ms

iCEDQ-partner-HP-Vertica.png

iCEDQ-partner-HP-Vertica.png

28 ms

BigTap-Partner-Img-iceDQ.png

BigTap-Partner-Img-iceDQ.png

29 ms

Tiger-Analytics-Partner-Img-iceDQ.png

Tiger-Analytics-Partner-Img-iceDQ.png

125 ms

iCEDQ-Standard-Edition.png

iCEDQ-Standard-Edition.png

29 ms

iCEDQ-HT-Edition.png

iCEDQ-HT-Edition.png

30 ms

iCEDQ-Spark-Edition.png

iCEDQ-Spark-Edition.png

43 ms

ETL-Testing-And-Big-Data-Testing-iCEDQ.png

ETL-Testing-And-Big-Data-Testing-iCEDQ.png

46 ms

iceDQ-Client01662bb4f15f663_70_160.png

iceDQ-Client01662bb4f15f663_70_160.png

54 ms

iceDQ-Client06662bb4f16df29_70_160.png

iceDQ-Client06662bb4f16df29_70_160.png

57 ms

iceDQ-Client07662bb4f173c35_70_160.png

iceDQ-Client07662bb4f173c35_70_160.png

71 ms

iceDQ-Client02662bb4f17506a_70_160.png

iceDQ-Client02662bb4f17506a_70_160.png

69 ms

iceDQ-Client03662bb4f18270d_70_160.png

iceDQ-Client03662bb4f18270d_70_160.png

82 ms

iceDQ-Client05662bb4f18e2a0_70_160.png

iceDQ-Client05662bb4f18e2a0_70_160.png

89 ms

iceDQ-Client04662bb4f1a4cdc_70_160.png

iceDQ-Client04662bb4f1a4cdc_70_160.png

97 ms

iceDQ-Client08662bb4f1825ae_70_160.png

iceDQ-Client08662bb4f1825ae_70_160.png

102 ms

iceDQ-Client10662bb4f18614d_70_160.png

iceDQ-Client10662bb4f18614d_70_160.png

108 ms

iceDQ-Client09662bb4f1abfb3_70_160.png

iceDQ-Client09662bb4f1abfb3_70_160.png

113 ms

Data-connector-iCEDQ.png

Data-connector-iCEDQ.png

447 ms

Connection-02-iCEDQ.png

Connection-02-iCEDQ.png

127 ms

Connection-03-iCEDQ.png

Connection-03-iCEDQ.png

134 ms

Connection-01-iCEDQ.png

Connection-01-iCEDQ.png

378 ms

Capterra.png

Capterra.png

151 ms

G2Crowd.png

G2Crowd.png

164 ms

Connect-with-iCEDQ-on-Facebook.png

Connect-with-iCEDQ-on-Facebook.png

178 ms

Connect-with-iCEDQ-on-LinkedIn.png

Connect-with-iCEDQ-on-LinkedIn.png

199 ms

Connect-with-iceDQ-on-Twitter.png

Connect-with-iceDQ-on-Twitter.png

200 ms

Connect-with-iCEDQ-on-YouTube.png

Connect-with-iCEDQ-on-YouTube.png

204 ms

Connect-with-iCEDQ-on-LinkedIn-Groups.png

Connect-with-iCEDQ-on-LinkedIn-Groups.png

222 ms

controls.png

controls.png

199 ms

Accessibility Review

icedq.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

icedq.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

icedq.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Icedq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Icedq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

icedq.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ICEDQ. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: