8.3 sec in total
440 ms
6.8 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing ICG Online content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about icgonline.co.uk
OUR WORK A responsive and proactive marketing partner that you can rely on. View More
Visit icgonline.co.ukWe analyzed Icgonline.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 440 ms and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
icgonline.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.7 s
2/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value14.7 s
1/100
10%
Value10,100 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.217
57/100
15%
Value18.4 s
3/100
10%
440 ms
572 ms
418 ms
81 ms
80 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Icgonline.co.uk, 77% (60 requests) were made to Icg.agency and 5% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) relates to the external source Icg.agency.
Page size can be reduced by 168.6 kB (13%)
1.3 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Icgonline.co.uk main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.2 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.8 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ICG Online images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.5 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Icgonline.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (22%)
74
58
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ICG Online. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
icgonline.co.uk
440 ms
www.icg.agency
572 ms
osano.js
418 ms
main.min.css
81 ms
slick.min.css
80 ms
jquery-confirm.min.css
166 ms
popup.min.css
79 ms
all.min.css
173 ms
copypastesubscribeformlogic.js
154 ms
jquery-3.1.0.min.js
156 ms
jquery-confirm.min.js
179 ms
slick.min.js
767 ms
main.min.js
767 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
161 ms
animate.min.css
178 ms
analytics.js
357 ms
gtm.js
777 ms
fbevents.js
770 ms
PartnerBadgeClickable.svg
669 ms
2020-logo.svg
674 ms
create-great-results.jpg
928 ms
create-great-partnerships.jpg
1042 ms
create-great-recognition.jpg
1025 ms
icg-casestudy-dalton-park-header.jpg
801 ms
dalton-park-logo.png
826 ms
icg-casestudy-gexcon-header.jpg
1086 ms
gexcon-logo.png
1286 ms
icg-casestudy-luxaflex-01.jpg
1428 ms
luxaflex-logo.png
1347 ms
icg-casestudy-SRA-header.jpg
1446 ms
sra-logo.png
1539 ms
icg-casestudy-sunbelt-header.jpg
1699 ms
sunbelt-logodown.png
1891 ms
icg-casestudy-fylde-header.jpg
1888 ms
fylde-logo.png
1950 ms
icg-casestudy-bfc-header.jpg
1975 ms
bfc-logo.png
2041 ms
icg-casestudy-intonation-06.jpg
2228 ms
intonation-logo.png
2463 ms
icg-casestudy-comfi-header.jpg
2502 ms
comfi-logo.png
2471 ms
icg-casestudy-braintree-header.jpg
2615 ms
braintree-logo.png
2536 ms
icg-casestudy-lfe-06.jpg
2732 ms
lfe-logo.png
2963 ms
icg-casestudy-lsi-header.jpg
2977 ms
lsi-logo.png
3000 ms
client-logos-desktop.jpg
2544 ms
client-logos-mobile.jpg
2563 ms
Prolific%20North%20Marketing%20Awards%202022.png
3151 ms
Racing_Brands_ICG.jpg
3295 ms
IMG_2870%20(1).jpg
3331 ms
Camp%20ICG%202022%20highlights.jpg
3698 ms
Regular.otf
3106 ms
Bold.otf
3395 ms
collect
261 ms
collect
157 ms
416367389806830
97 ms
Mental%20Health%20Week.jpg
2928 ms
js
129 ms
Chloe%20Jervis.jpg
3106 ms
Cotswolds%20Designer%20Outlet%20Brochure%20cover.jpg
3225 ms
ga-audiences
196 ms
Illustration%20of%20woman%20holding%20a%20pink%20heart.jpg
2851 ms
Photo%20of%20Lucy%20Wignall.jpg
3233 ms
ICG_Marketing_Survey_Jan2022.jpg
2969 ms
ICG_LeadershipTeam.jpg
3127 ms
St%20Marys%20College%20New%20Website_1.jpg
3106 ms
Dec21_Highlights21%20(2).jpg
3157 ms
GiveBackLancsWildlifeTrust.jpg
3115 ms
staining-schools-children-with-cheque.jpg
3384 ms
facebook.svg
3141 ms
twitter.svg
2888 ms
linkedin.svg
2923 ms
vimeo.svg
3098 ms
BAAP_badge_EN.gif
2585 ms
hootsuite.gif
2567 ms
digital-lancashire.gif
2509 ms
icgonline.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
icgonline.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
icgonline.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Icgonline.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Icgonline.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
icgonline.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ICG Online. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: